• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES AORTIC EXCLUDER AAA ENDOPROSTHESIS (C3); SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES AORTIC EXCLUDER AAA ENDOPROSTHESIS (C3); SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number RLT261414
Device Problems Complete Blockage (1094); Collapse (1099); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problems Occlusion (1984); Thromboembolism (2654); Vascular Dissection (3160)
Event Date 05/20/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
A review of the manufacturing records for the devices could not be conducted as the lot/serial numbers are not available.Further information was requested but was not available.(b)(4).The explanted devices will be sent for analysis.Further information will be provided.
 
Event Description
On (b)(6) 2017, this patient underwent an endovascular abdominal aneurysm repair and was treated with gore® excluder® aaa endoprostheses.On (b)(6) 2019, follow-up imaging reportedly revealed the gore® excluder® aaa endoprosthesis featuring c3® delivery system (rlt 261414/unknown) was compressed and all devices and iliac arteries were totally thrombosed.On (b)(6) 2019, the endoprostheses were explanted and subsequently replaced with a dacron® stent graft.The patient tolerated the procedure.According to the physician the acute dissection caused the problem.Further information was requested but was not available.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H6: conclusion codes.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: b5: event description.D10: device available for evaluation.H3: device evaluated by manufacturer.Code 3221: a review of the manufacturing records for the devices could not be conducted as the lot/serial numbers are not available.Further information was requested but was not available.The explanted devices were sent to gore for analysis and the following was found: submitted in formalin were two tissue fragments of unknown origin (tissue 1-2) and three gore® excluder® aaa endoprostheses in three segments; one trunk ¿ ipsilateral leg endoprosthesis fragment (tf-1) containing a contralateral leg endoprosthesis fragment (clf-1) within the transected ipsilateral leg, one trunk ¿ ipsilateral leg endoprosthesis fragment (tf-2) with one contralateral leg endoprosthesis fragment (clf-2) within and protruding out distally and one contralateral leg endoprosthesis (cl).Device fragments had been transected prior to arrival at w.L.Gore and associates.The lumens of all device and device fragments were patent.The abluminal surfaces were generally devoid of tissue, except scattered plaques of friable red/brown material.Tf-1 had a focal, relatively thin slab of hard, light tan tissue firmly adhered to the ablumen on the proximal end of the device; tissue was on the opposing surface of the flattened trunk.In the proximal lumen of tf-1, light tan tissue was observable, but could not be fully visualized, due to the device being flattened.Friable, light tan tissue was observed in the lumen of clf-1.The trunk region of tf-1, proximal to the area of bifurcation, retained a flattened/concave shape with wire discontinuities on the perimeter of the flattened area.Just distal of the area of bifurcation of tf-1, the ipsilateral leg was flattened/folded with surrounding wire discontinuities on opposing sides of the fold.A focal, circumferentially constraining thin slab of hard, light tan, firmly adherent tissue presenting in a curved fashion, was present on the distal ablumen of the cl; multiple wire discontinuities were noted in this region.Seven tissue specimens from the abluminal/luminal surfaces of the device, device fragments, and a free floating tissue specimen, were collected and histopathological examination was performed.Tissue situated on the abluminal surface of the devices, where present, was consistent with aneurysmal remnants.Regions immediately adjacent to device abluminal surfaces consisted of acute thrombus.Tissue situated on the luminal surface of the devices was consistent with acute or sometimes organizing, thrombus.Lymphohistiocytic inflammation also lined the luminal/abluminal device surfaces and was a consistent healing response to these endoprostheses at this implant time period.There was no gross or microscopic evidence of infection.The device and device fragments were subjected to an enzymatic digestion process to remove biologic debris.Following digestion all device and device fragments were examined for material disruptions with the aid of a stereomicroscope.The proximal trunk (tf-1) presented in a typical open and cylindrical fashion.Eleven wire discontinuities were present in the main body of the trunk, where the device had previously been flattened.Two holes were also present in the main body, which were consistent with a wire discontinuity puncturing the graft material.Five additional wire discontinuities were present, on the ipsilateral leg segment, on opposing sides where the device was flattened/folded prior to digestion.The cl had four wire discontinuities identified on opposing sides (two on each side) of cl.Three of the wire discontinuities were bordering the proximal end of the circumferentially constraining tissue, which was present prior to digestion.Representative wire discontinuity specimens were collected for metallurgical analysis from tf-1 and the cl.The examined wire discontinuities exhibited characteristics consistent with fracture, due to cyclic fatigue loading.No evidence of corrosion or abnormal abrasion was observed on the nitinol wire.The cause of the device compression is unknown.According to the physician, it was suspected as a hypothesis that may be the acute dissection caused the problem.According to the gore® excluder® aaa endoprosthesis instructions for use (ifu), adverse events that may occur and / or require intervention include, but are not limited to occlusion of device or native vessel and surgical conversion.Additionally, according to the ifu, key anatomic elements that may affect successful exclusion of the aneurysm include significant thrombus and / or calcium at the arterial implantation sites, specifically the proximal aortic neck and distal iliac artery interface.
 
Event Description
According to the physician, it was suspected as a hypothesis that may be the acute dissection caused the problem.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AORTIC EXCLUDER AAA ENDOPROSTHESIS (C3)
Type of Device
SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES
flagstaff AZ
MDR Report Key8719331
MDR Text Key148743082
Report Number2017233-2019-00450
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MIH
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P020004
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type distributor
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 12/30/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberRLT261414
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/15/2019
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received06/20/2019
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/23/2019
12/30/2019
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age85 YR
Patient Weight70
-
-