Catalog Number UNK HIP FEMORAL STEM |
Device Problems
Loss of or Failure to Bond (1068); Fracture (1260)
|
Patient Problems
Pain (1994); No Code Available (3191)
|
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
The models of prostheses used include a duraloc 100 series (depuy) titanium cementless acetabular shell (60-mm outer diameter) with an enduron (depuy) polyethylene liner (28-mm inner diameter, neutral, 14mm offset) and a cemented c-stem (size 6) femoral stem with an elite (depuy) zirconia head (28 mm, standard offset).A cement restrictor as well as an end cap and centralizer for the c-stem were also utilized.Please note, cement manufacturer is not provided.The patient reported pain in the left hip and thigh.At that time, radiographs revealed lucency at the bone-cement interface at the medial calcar.5 days later, the patient sustained a fall, radiographs then presented a periprosthetic bone fracture as well as a fracture through the middle third of the femoral stem.The proximal portion of the stem appeared loose, and the distal portion appeared well fixed.Doi: 11 years prior to fracture of the c-stem.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Product complaint #: (b)(4).Investigation summary: no device associated with this report was received for examination.Visual examination of the provided x-ray images and photograph confirmed the reported event.A worldwide lot specific complaint database search, or device history record (dhr) review, was not possible because the required lot number was not provided.The information received will be retained for potential series investigations if triggered by trend analysis, post market surveillance, or other events within the quality system.Device history lot: null.Device history batch: null.Device history review: null.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|