• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION UNKNOWN IMPLANTABLE NEUROSTIMULATOR; IMPLANTED SUBCORTICAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATOR (MOTOR DISORDERS)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION UNKNOWN IMPLANTABLE NEUROSTIMULATOR; IMPLANTED SUBCORTICAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATOR (MOTOR DISORDERS) Back to Search Results
Model Number NEU_INS_STIMULATOR
Device Problems Break (1069); Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 04/29/2019
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The average age of the patients reported in the article as specific patients could not be identified.The gender of the majority of the patients reported in the article as specific patients could not be identified.Please note that this date is based off of the date of publication of the article as the event dates were not provided in the published literature.Other relevant device(s) are: product id: 3387, serial/ lot #: unknown ; product id: neu_ins_stimulator, serial/ lot #: unknown ; product id: 3387, serial/ lot #: unknown ; product id: neu_unknown_ext, serial/ lot #: unknown (product id: neu_ins_stimulator, serial/ lot #: unknown) x 7 tsuboi, t., jabarkheel, z., foote, kd., okun, ms., wagle shukla, a.Importance of the initial response to gpi deep brain stimulation in dystonia: a nine year quality of life study.Parkinsonism relat disord.2019.Doi: 10.1016/ j.Parkreldis.2019.04.024.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Summary: background: long-term efficacy of deep brain stimulation (dbs) on health-related quality-of-life (hrqol) for isolated dystonia is not well established.This study aims to determine the long-term impact of dbs on hrqol outcomes and identify clinical predictors.Methods: we retrospectively investigated 16 inherited or idiopathic isolated dystonia patients treated with bilateral globus pallidus internus dbs who were followed beyond 9 years at our center.The cohort consisted of 9 males, 7 females; 10 generalized, 6 segmental; mean (range) age at implantation, 37.0 (8¿67) years; mean follow-up duration after implantation, 10.9 (9¿13) years.We employed the unified dystonia rating scale for motor and short form health survey for hrqol assessments to monitor the change longitudinally.We analyzed the changes in motor and hrqol at 1¿2 years (short-term) and =9 years (long-term) follow-up as compared to baseline with a wilcoxon signed-rank test.We assessed the factors that predicted motor and hrqol improvement with univariate regression analyses.Results: motor (41.6%; p=0.004) and hrqol (total score, p=0.039) improvements remained significant at long-term follow-up and, in the regression analysis, change in hrqol outcomes correlated significantly with change in motor outcomes (r2=0.384, p=0.010).Additionally, short-term motor and hrqol improvements predicted the long-term motor (r2=0.384, p=0.010) and hrqol (total score, r2=0.594, p < 0.001) outcomes, respectively.Conclusion: motor and hrqol improvements with dbs in isolated dystonia remain sustained for nearlya decade and may largely be predictable by the short-term response to dbs.Reported events: patient 15: a (b)(6)-year-old patient with bilateral gpi-dbs for dystonia experienced migration of the left lead 8 years after implant, which the authors reported was possibly due to growth.3 patients with dbs for dystonia experienced an unspecified ¿stimulator malfunction.¿ 3 patients with dbs for dystonia experienced electrode breakage.2 patients with dbs for dystonia experienced an extension cable fracture.The authors reported that patients received 3387 leads and either activa pc/ sc 37601-37603 or soletra 7426 neurostimulators.It was not possible to ascertain any additional specific device information from the article or to match the reported event with any previously reported event.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNKNOWN IMPLANTABLE NEUROSTIMULATOR
Type of Device
IMPLANTED SUBCORTICAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATOR (MOTOR DISORDERS)
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION
800 53rd ave ne
minneapolis MN 55421 1200
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION
800 53rd ave ne
minneapolis MN 55421 1200
Manufacturer Contact
lisa woodward clark
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263920
MDR Report Key8744497
MDR Text Key214146044
Report Number3007566237-2019-01424
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MRU
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
H020007
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,literatur
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 06/28/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberNEU_INS_STIMULATOR
Device Catalogue NumberNEU_INS_STIMULATOR
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 05/29/2019
Initial Date FDA Received06/28/2019
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age37 YR
-
-