The device and the lens were returned separated.The plunger is oriented correctly.Viscoelastic is observed in the device.The plunger has been retracted behind the fill line.A broken haptic is observed.The gusset area of the haptic is on top of the plunger.The rest of the haptic is in front of the plunger.The lens was returned inside a plastic specimen cup.Viscoelastic is observed.One haptic is broken-gusset area.The optic is cut into two pieces.Product history records were reviewed and documentation indicated the product met release criteria.Viscoelastic was not provided.It is unknown if the qualified product was used.The root cause for the broken haptic could not be determined.The broken haptic is in front of the plunger with the gusset area on top of the plunger.The plunger was retracted.The plunger position in relation to the broken haptic during advancement cannot be determined.The trailing haptic position may indicate it was not in a proper position for advancement per the provided diagrams in the dfu.The dfu instructs: after the lens has been advanced to the nozzle line, the lens should be visually inspected to determine the position of the haptics.The plunger should be in contact with the trailing optic edge.After confirming the lens is properly positioned and the haptics are folded properly, proceed with lens implantation.Proceeding with implantation of a misfolded haptic or a lens that appears to be ¿out of position¿ can result in a broken haptic or other negative outcome, since the haptic may be trapped and stretched, and/or pinched and sheared by the moving plunger.It is unknown if a qualified viscoelastic was used.Material properties of non-qualified ovds may contribute to underfill, overfill, misfolding of the haptics, or other inconsistent folding outcomes.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|