• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TORAX MEDICAL, INC. 1.5T LINX, 13B; ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TORAX MEDICAL, INC. 1.5T LINX, 13B; ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number LXMC13
Device Problem Disconnection (1171)
Patient Problem No Code Available (3191)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Date of event: only event year known: 2019.Batch # unk.Attempts have been made to retrieve the device.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Is there an x-ray of the linx device prior to the automobile accident? if yes, please send a copy to (b)(4).Does the surgeon believe that the automobile accident contributed to the discontinuous device? what was the severity of the automobile accident? what symptoms lead to the discovery of the discontinuous device? when did they begin? when was the device implanted? what is the device lot number? was the device initially effective in controlling reflux? were any events associated with the onset of symptoms (vomiting, retching, trauma, surgery)? did the patient undergo an mri since device implant? if so, when was the mri and what strength? did the patient have any other surgeries in the area? was any additional imaging performed since device implant? does the device appear to be in a continuous annular state in these images? we are interested in establishing a window when the device may have become discontinuous.Please share any additional images.What is the management plan? is device removal scheduled? is a replacement linx or fundoplication planned? when and if the explanation takes place can we ask that the procedure gets video recorded and the video shared?.
 
Event Description
It was reported that post implant the patient was doing well but was recently in an automobile accident.X-ray shows a discontinuous linx device.It is unknown if there were any adverse patient consequences.Device is still implanted and will be available for return, removal tbd.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Date sent: 09/11/2019.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: is there an x-ray of the linx device prior to the automobile accident? if yes, please send a copy to (b)(4).Does the surgeon believe that the automobile accident contributed to the discontinuous device? possible.What was the severity of the automobile accident? what symptoms lead to the discovery of the discontinuous device? when did they begin? when was the device implanted? (b)(6) 2016.What is the device lot number? 9756.Was the device initially effective in controlling reflux? yes!! were any events associated with the onset of symptoms (vomiting, retching, trauma, surgery)? no.Did the patient undergo an mri since device implant? if so, when was the mri and what strength? no.Did the patient have any other surgeries in the area? no.Was any additional imaging performed since device implant? does the device appear to be in a continuous annular state in these images? we are interested in establishing a window when the device may have become discontinuous.Please share any additional images.I will send to you what is the management plan? is device removal scheduled? is a replacement linx or fundoplication planned? removed and new linx placed.When and if the explanation takes place can we ask that the procedure gets video recorded and the video shared?.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Date sent: 10/29/2019.Per photographic evaluation: x-ray image of a device was received.The analysis of the x-ray image indicates a discontinuous device which is evidenced by a wide separation between two beads.The mechanism of failure cannot be established based on the x-ray image.Please refer to the device analysis for more details.Device analysis: visual analysis was consistent with an explanted device, and link length and tensile force were found to meet the applicable specifications.The remaining device characteristics show no anomalies for a device that has been reasonably changed as part of the explant procedure.Analysis found that the returned device had an exposed weld ball visible paired with the male bead case of the adjacent bead.The male bead case through hole was measured with computed tomography (ct) and was found to be out of specification.The paired weld ball diameter was found to meet specifications.Overall review of the device function and dimensions, excluding the out of specification male bead case hole, show no anomalies from a device that has been reasonably changed as part of the explant procedure.As the device was tested to 250g tensile force in production, it is presumed that a certain geometric combination of the weld ball and the washer hole resulted in the device separation in vivo.The dhr for lot 9756 was reviewed.No defects, ncrs, or reworks related to the product complaint were found.Lot 9756 was an affected lot of the 2018 linx recall.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
1.5T LINX, 13B
Type of Device
ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
TORAX MEDICAL, INC.
4188 lexington avenue north
shoreview MN
MDR Report Key8841178
MDR Text Key152637233
Report Number3008766073-2019-00402
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LEI
UDI-Device Identifier00855106005332
UDI-Public00855106005332
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P100049
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 07/15/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date12/10/2019
Device Catalogue NumberLXMC13
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/13/2019
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/15/2019
Initial Date FDA Received07/30/2019
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received08/13/2019
10/08/2019
Supplement Dates FDA Received09/11/2019
10/29/2019
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-