Investigation results: the products have been received in a used and decontaminated condition.Investigation was carried out visually and microscopically.A functional testing has been performed.Furthermore the clamp has been reviewed together with r&d and product management, the product was found to be according to specifications.This failure is a known phenomenon that can occur during surgeries and is covered by the risk analysis.The customer stated that the aesculap clamp in comparison to the ethicon clamp does not perform comparable.With ethicon clamps such failures haven't been provoked.In internal tests it could be confirmed, that the ethicon purse string clamp performs in worst case conditions better than the aesculap purse string clamp.If in this case a worst case is given it cannot be determined only on the basis of the pictures.The ethicon clamp shows two differences.The position of the pinholes who are guiding the needle is closer to the teeth of the clamp, the measured distance from outside part of both holes is in case of aesculap 4,65 mm and in case of ethicon 3,65 mm.The geometry of the teeth is rounded and not straight as in case of aesculap.The device quality and manufacturing history records have been checked for the available lot number and found to be according to our specifications valid at the time of production.No similar incidents have been filed with products from this batch.Based upon our investigation and the information available the root cause is most likely a combination of a patient related influence, representing a worst case, and design related influences which do not allow to perform adequately in case of worst case.As internal tests confirmed, the ethicon purse string clamp design shows better results in worst case conditions.It is possible, that the surgery was such a worst case condition and therefore the purse string suture could not be applied as required.A capa has been initiated.
|