The exact date of the event is unknown.The provided event date was chosen as a best estimate based on the date that the manufacturer has received the device.The complainant was unable to provide the suspect device lot number; therefore the device manufacture date and expiration date are unknown.(b)(4).Visual analysis of the returned device found the cone was broken and there was slight discoloration around the break.Additionally, kinks were noted along the working length.Based on the condition of the device, it is most likely that during the procedure the device came into contact with electrified equipment or a laser.The directions for use (dfu) states "do not directly fire upon the device with a laser." therefore, the most probable root cause for this complaint is failure to follow instructions, which indicates that the problem was traced to the user not following the manufacturer's instructions.A review of the device history record (dhr) confirmed that the device met all material, assembly, and product specifications at the time of release to distribution.
|
Boston scientific corporation received an unauthorized return of a stone cone nitinol urological retrieval coil that was used during a procedure.It was found that the cone was broken, and there was slight discoloration around the break.Attempts to obtain additional information regarding the circumstances surrounding this event have been unsuccessful to date.Should additional relevant details become available, a supplemental report will be submitted.
|