The surgeon, informed us about the fracture of a ceramic insert at the moment of impact during a hip arthroplasty.There was multiple debris, so abundant rinsing was required.A new ceramic insert had to be placed.The initial ceramic insert was correctly positioned prior impact.Due to the issue, the procedure was prolonged for about 20 minutes.Patient is now stable.
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.No device was received.Root cause undetermined.Depuy synthes considers the investigation closed at this time.Should additional information be received, the information will be reviewed and the investigation may be re-opened as necessary.Investigation methods: was patient affected: no.Device history reviewed: yes.Lot trace obtained: no.Complaints database searched: yes.Product checked: no.Label checked: no.Product pulled from stock for inspection: no.A review of complaint databases did not identify any anomalies.It should be noted no device was returned.The supplier report was received which states the component properties and the microstructures as obtained from the quality documents accomplish the requirements as specified at the time of production.There are no indications of any pre existing material defect.Due to a lack of ceramic parts further investigations cannot be done.Protocols and certificate of conformance were reviewed.The quality documents show that the values obtained on the part were according to the specification valid at the time of production.Without the physical complaint sample(s) associated with this report, it was not possible to determine if the device(s) failed to meet specification(s) at the time it was released for distribution.The device(s) associated with this event were used in the treatment of the patient as prescribed by the presiding surgeon.From the event information received, it was not possible to determine the relationship of the device to the reported event.No information received with this individual complaint indicated that a broader investigation or corrective action was necessary.Depuy synthes considers the investigation closed at this time.Should additional information be received, the information will be reviewed and the investigation may be re-opened as necessary.The complaint shall be closed with an undetermined conclusion; entered into the complaints database and monitored through trend analysis.Post market surveillance is per sep 419.Device history lot: the quality documents show that the values obtained on the part were according to the specification valid at the time of production.Device history batch : null.Device history review : null.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|