A review of the device history record (dhr) confirmed the device met all of the required inspections and specifications at the time it was released.Device evaluation: functional testing could not be completed as the device was received in pieces.As a result, the reported distraction issue could not be confirmed.Visual inspection revealed end cap was disengaged from the rod, the retaining ring was missing, and there was a fracture through the pin hole at the distal end of the lead screw.Per the surgeon, the clip ring may have failed prior to rod removal but the clip had been removed from the patient and possibly lost during the decontamination process; however, the surgeon stated the lead screw fracture likely occurred as a result of the use of a rod gripper and hammer during rod removal.Visual inspection also noted the o-ring seal was intact, the radial bearing was clean, and the locking pin was intact and properly seated in the magnet module.A definitive cause of the reported distraction issue cannot be determined; however, based on the evaluation findings, it is possible the distraction issue was a result of the end cap disengagement.End cap disengagement issues were addressed under recall 3006179046-02/20/2020-r (fda # z-1898-2020).It was also reported the surgeon noted moderate metallosis during the rod removal procedure; however, no objective evidence has been provided and therefore, the reported metallosis was unable to be confirmed.
|