Corrected data: see d2; d4; d11.Narrative data: the reason for this revision surgery was due infection.The previous revision surgery and the revision surgery detailed in this event occurred 12.1 months apart.The healthcare professional indicated there was no significant adverse event to the patient.There was no delay in surgery and another suitable device was available for use.The revision surgery was completed as intended.The device was disposed of at the hospital and not made available to djo surgical for examination.There was no information submitted with this complaint about any patient activities, accidents, or medical contraindications that may have contributed to the reported event.A review of the device history records could not be conducted.Because of the acquisition by djo surgical, an extended search of zimmer biomet records cannot be conducted.Any records before the acquisition date, that have not been forwarded, will not be made available.Customer complaint history of the reported device showed no present trends or on-going issues that are needing a review.The root cause of this complaint was a revision surgery due to an infection.There were no findings during this investigation that indicate that the reported device was defective.No information was submitted with the complaint regarding pre-existing conditions of the patient or any activities the patient was involved in that may have contributed to the infection or inhibited the patient's immune system.There are multiple factors that may contribute to an infection that are outside of the control of djo surgical.
|