• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS, INC. DIAMONDBACK 360 CORONARY ORBITAL ATHERECTOMY SYSTEM; CORONARY ATHERECTOMY DEVICE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS, INC. DIAMONDBACK 360 CORONARY ORBITAL ATHERECTOMY SYSTEM; CORONARY ATHERECTOMY DEVICE Back to Search Results
Model Number DBEC-125
Device Problems Off-Label Use (1494); Device Damaged by Another Device (2915)
Patient Problem Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
Event Date 07/26/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The reported device was discarded by the facility and was not returned for analysis.Therefore, the exact root cause of the event remains unknown.However, based on the reported information, it appears the device was used in an off-label manner; the device was operated within a previously placed stent.The diamondback 360® coronary orbital atherectomy system instructions for use states that use of the oas is contraindicated when the target lesion is within a stent.Ultimately, based on the information received, the cause of the reported event could not be conclusively determined.The device history record for the reported oad was unable to be reviewed, as the lot number was not provided.Csi id: (b)(4).
 
Event Description
The diamondback coronary orbital atherectomy device (oad) was used during a procedure for treatment of a 50% restenosed stent in the right coronary artery (rca).The distal portion of the stent was under-expanded and malposed.A balloon was initially inflated inside the restenosis and distal malposed portion of the stent.Following multiple attempts with cutting balloons and laser atherectomy, an intravascular ultrasound catheter still could not be advanced into the stented lesion.The oad was then selected for use due to the lesion location and since the patient was not a bypass candidate.Three atherectomy treatments were successfully performed on low speed, but during the fourth treatment, the oad became stuck.The stent was tangled over the oad, and the driveshaft and stent were removed together.Additional balloon inflations were performed, and another stent was placed.At the conclusion of the procedure, a residual stenosis remained, and the vessel showed excellent flow.An echocardiogram was performed to ensure there was no pericardial effusion; no effusion was observed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
DIAMONDBACK 360 CORONARY ORBITAL ATHERECTOMY SYSTEM
Type of Device
CORONARY ATHERECTOMY DEVICE
Manufacturer (Section D)
CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS, INC.
1225 old hwy 8 nw
st. paul MN 55112
Manufacturer (Section G)
CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS, INC.
1225 old hwy 8 nw
st. paul MN 55112
Manufacturer Contact
morgan hill
1225 old hwy 8 nw
st. paul, MN 55112
MDR Report Key8921526
MDR Text Key155243763
Report Number3004742232-2019-00221
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MCX
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P130005
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 08/22/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberDBEC-125
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/26/2019
Initial Date FDA Received08/22/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age80 YR
Patient Weight63
-
-