CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS, INC. DIAMONDBACK 360 CORONARY ORBITAL ATHERECTOMY SYSTEM; CORONARY ATHERECTOMY DEVICE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number DBEC-125 |
Device Problems
Off-Label Use (1494); Device Damaged by Another Device (2915)
|
Patient Problem
Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
|
Event Date 07/26/2019 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The reported device was discarded by the facility and was not returned for analysis.Therefore, the exact root cause of the event remains unknown.However, based on the reported information, it appears the device was used in an off-label manner; the device was operated within a previously placed stent.The diamondback 360® coronary orbital atherectomy system instructions for use states that use of the oas is contraindicated when the target lesion is within a stent.Ultimately, based on the information received, the cause of the reported event could not be conclusively determined.The device history record for the reported oad was unable to be reviewed, as the lot number was not provided.Csi id: (b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
The diamondback coronary orbital atherectomy device (oad) was used during a procedure for treatment of a 50% restenosed stent in the right coronary artery (rca).The distal portion of the stent was under-expanded and malposed.A balloon was initially inflated inside the restenosis and distal malposed portion of the stent.Following multiple attempts with cutting balloons and laser atherectomy, an intravascular ultrasound catheter still could not be advanced into the stented lesion.The oad was then selected for use due to the lesion location and since the patient was not a bypass candidate.Three atherectomy treatments were successfully performed on low speed, but during the fourth treatment, the oad became stuck.The stent was tangled over the oad, and the driveshaft and stent were removed together.Additional balloon inflations were performed, and another stent was placed.At the conclusion of the procedure, a residual stenosis remained, and the vessel showed excellent flow.An echocardiogram was performed to ensure there was no pericardial effusion; no effusion was observed.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|