Concomitant devices: flexability catheter, swartz introducer, event date unknown.The results of the investigation are inconclusive since the device was not returned for analysis.Review of the device history record was not possible as the lot number is unknown.Based on the information received, the cause of the reported incident could not be conclusively determined.Per the ifu, cardiac perforation is a known risk during the use of this device.
|
Related manufacturer reference number: 3005334138-2019-00459, 3005334138-2019-00460.The following was published in heart rhythm society in an article titled ¿hybrid surgical vs percutaneous access epicardial ventricular tachycardia ablation by li a, hayase j, do d, et al., 2018;15:512¿519.¿we performed a retrospective study of consecutive surgical epicardial ventricular tachycardia (vt) ablation cases from a single center.Surgical cases were propensity-matched to percutaneous epicardial ablation controls and short-term and long-term outcomes were compared.The study population comprised 38 consecutive patients who underwent mapping and ablation using a hybrid surgical technique at the university of california los angeles cardiac arrhythmia center between 2004 and 2016.Short-term procedural complications occurred, including generalized bleeding with no focal source in 1 patient, which prevented anticoagulation for endocardial lv mapping.Damage to the ventricle requiring intraoperative repair occurred in 2 patients during adhesiolysis, requiring a simple oversew.Damage to an epigastric artery occurred in 1 patient, requiring extension of the initial access for exploration and clipping.There was also 1 instance of wound infection and 2 vascular access complications.(https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.Hrthm.2017.11.009).
|