• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ARTHROSURFACE, INC. ARTHROSURFACE TOEMOTION; ARTHROSURFACE® TOTAL TOE - PROXIMAL PHALANX IMPLANT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ARTHROSURFACE, INC. ARTHROSURFACE TOEMOTION; ARTHROSURFACE® TOTAL TOE - PROXIMAL PHALANX IMPLANT Back to Search Results
Device Problem Loose or Intermittent Connection (1371)
Patient Problem Inadequate Pain Relief (2388)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The rep who attended the revision case was contacted for further information regarding this incident.Per the rep, the phalangeal component was very well fixated and had to be retrieved using a screw driver for the revision procedure.It was not clear why loosening was indicated on the revision notification form.The complaint could not be confirmed as the device in question or radiographs showing loosening were not provided to arthrosurface for investigation.The device history records (dhrs) of the implant lots in question were reviewed and noted that all parts were built to specification.A valid root cause for the pain or reported loosening cannot be determined based on available information.The instructions for use (ifu) document states that reported events can occur, and all risks are addressed in the risk documentation as a apart of the design control.Several factors such as stress/ physical loads on the implants, vascularity of the implantation site, surgical techniques employed during implantation, patient factors (such as age, current state of the immune system, bone quality, and sensitivity to device materials), and patient post-op compliance to rehabilitation procedures etc., can have impact on the functional effectiveness of the implanted devices.If additional relevant information is received, information will be reviewed for reportability and submitted accordingly.The patient was revised to a fusion and all arthrosurface devices have been explanted.Following is the information of implants in question.Part # 9p15-s180-w, lot # 75ch3104, mfg.Date: 04/12/2018, exp.Date: 04/12/2023.Part # 9p15-pa01-w, lot # 75ah2006, mfg.Date: 02/20/2018, exp.Date: 02/20/2025.
 
Event Description
Arthrosurface received a revision notification on 07/30/2019 regarding a toemotion patient who was revised due to pain.The revision notification form also indicated that the phalangeal fixation component was loose.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ARTHROSURFACE TOEMOTION
Type of Device
ARTHROSURFACE® TOTAL TOE - PROXIMAL PHALANX IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
ARTHROSURFACE, INC.
28 forge parkway
franklin, ma 02038
Manufacturer (Section G)
PRIMO MEDICAL GROUP
75 mill st
stoughton, ma 02072
Manufacturer Contact
phani puppala
28 forge parkway
franklin, ma 02038
5085203003
MDR Report Key8945852
MDR Text Key194809460
Report Number3004154314-2019-00009
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LZJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K132496
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type distributor
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 07/30/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/30/2019
Initial Date FDA Received08/29/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-