• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: FUJIFILM CORPORATION FUJIFILM 600 SERIES ENDOSCOPE EG-600WR; FUJIFILM VIDEO ENDOSCOPE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

FUJIFILM CORPORATION FUJIFILM 600 SERIES ENDOSCOPE EG-600WR; FUJIFILM VIDEO ENDOSCOPE Back to Search Results
Model Number EG-600WR
Device Problems Mechanical Jam (2983); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problem Abrasion (1689)
Event Date 08/05/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Weight: unknown.Ethnicity:unknown.Race: unknown.Name and address: unknown.Occupation: unknown.Cause investigation: fujifilm requested the endoscope in question to be returned to (b)(4) for investigation.If any additional relevant information is provided, a supplemental report will be submitted.
 
Event Description
On (b)(6) 2019 fujifilm was informed that a patient in a south korean hospital presented with a mucosal injury post procedure with a fujifilm endoscope.This occurred due to the bending section of the endoscope becoming stuck in an upward bent position and causing mucosal bleeding during removal.Timeline: (b)(6) 2019 approximately 16:00: endoscopy procedure started.Approximately 90 seconds after the start of the procedure: when the bending section of the endoscope was bent upward to the maximum, the up/down angle dial (the dial that makes the bending section bend upward and downward) ceased to move, leaving the bending section in the bent state.The user tried to release the bend by inserting forceps into the forceps channel without success.About 18 minutes after the start of the procedure: the user inserted another endoscope through which a snare was placed to pull the bent section and reduce the bending angle.After that, the first endoscope was successfully removed.However, while doing so, bleeding occurred from the mucous membrane.About 33 minutes after the start of the procedure: endoscopic procedure was completed.Admission and additional examination were recommended to the patient, but the patient refused and moved to another hospital.Around 21:00: because another hospital refused to accept the patient, the patient returned to this hospital and was admitted.The patient complained of stomach upset.Patient situation: after hospitalization, ct images were taken and the patient is being monitored.Cause investigation: fujifilm requested the endoscope in question to be returned to (b)(4) for investigation.There was no death associated with this event; this report is being submitted in abundance of caution.
 
Event Description
On 06 aug 2019 fujifilm was informed that a patient in a (b)(6) hospital presented with a mucosal injury post procedure with a fujifilm endoscope.This occurred due to the bending section of the endoscope becoming stuck in an upward bent position and causing mucosal bleeding during removal.Timeline: 05 aug 2019 approximately 16:00: endoscopy procedure started.Approximately 90 seconds after the start of the procedure: when the bending section of the endoscope was bent upward to the maximum, the up/down angle dial (the dial that makes the bending section bend upward and downward) ceased to move, leaving the bending section in the bent state.The user tried to release the bend by inserting forceps into the forceps channel without success.About 18 minutes after the start of the procedure: the user inserted another endoscope through which a snare was placed to pull the bent section and reduce the bending angle.After that, the first endoscope was successfully removed.However, while doing so, bleeding occurred from the mucous membrane.About 33 minutes after the start of the procedure: endoscopic procedure was completed.Admission and additional examination were recommended to the patient, but the patient refused and moved to another hospital.Around 21:00: because another hospital refused to accept the patient, the patient returned to this hospital and was admitted.The patient complained of stomach upset.Patient situation: after hospitalization, ct images were taken and the patient is being monitored.Cause investigation: fujifilm requested the endoscope in question to be returned to japan for investigation.There was no death associated with this event; this report is being submitted in abundance of caution.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Patient demographics: unknown.Initial reporter information: unknown.Cause investigation summary: on 11 sep 2019 fujifilm corporation completed the investigation of subject scope and determined that the possible cause is related to repair/manufacturing.Fujifilm found an extra unsecured screw and traces of screw rubbing in the bending mechanism.It was determined that the operator left unnecessary screws in the scope.It was confirmed that the failure was reproduced when the screw was inserted into the bending mechanism.This defect is the first event and is considered extremely rare.If any additional relevant information is provided, a supplemental report will be submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FUJIFILM 600 SERIES ENDOSCOPE EG-600WR
Type of Device
FUJIFILM VIDEO ENDOSCOPE
Manufacturer (Section D)
FUJIFILM CORPORATION
798 miyanodai kaisei-machi
ashigarakami-gun
kanagawa, 00258 8538
JA  002588538
MDR Report Key8947190
MDR Text Key161057765
Report Number3001722928-2019-00010
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FDS
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K132210
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,distri
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/10/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberEG-600WR
Device Catalogue NumberN/A
Device Lot NumberN/A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 08/06/2019
Initial Date FDA Received08/29/2019
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received08/06/2019
Supplement Dates FDA Received10/10/2019
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Removal/Correction NumberN/A
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization;
Patient Age26 YR
-
-