Catalog Number 121722052 |
Device Problem
Device-Device Incompatibility (2919)
|
Patient Problem
Not Applicable (3189)
|
Event Date 08/14/2019 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the cup (p/n: 121722052) and the impactor (manufactured by fuji flex, p/n: apjp0740) were not able to separate when the surgeon inserted the cup during the tha surgery of the patient¿s left hip joint on (b)(6) 2019.(the cup and the impactor had been remaining in inseparable after all) the surgery was completed by using another same size multi-hole type cup and a standard cup impactor.There was within a 30 minutes surgical delay and there was no adverse consequence to the patient.No further information is available.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provision of 21 cfr, part 803.The report may be based on the information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary : the device was reviewed by the manufacturer and root cause was concluded as undetermined.Depuy synthes considers the investigation closed at this time.Should additional information be received, the information will be reviewed and the investigation may be re-opened as necessary.The device was reviewed by the manufacturer cork, and a report was received stating; the failure mode was determined to be ¿unable to separate impactor tool from cup.¿ due to no similar failures found in the dhr (device history record) review, inability to confirm root cause due to damage of the thread during forced separation of the part from the impactor tool, and no similar complaints within an 18-month period, the root cause of the complaint cannot be determined.Should further information come available that impacts the findings in this investigation it will be reopened.There is no patient risk as the affected part was not implanted.Product review: this would suggest that either the threaded apex hole on pinnacle cup from (b)(4) or the thread on the impactor tool would not meet specification.The complaint stated that the part (pinnacle cup) and the impactor tool were inseparable.On receipt of the returned part on site in depuy synthes, cork, just the part was received i.E.The impactor tool had been separated and removed prior to arriving at the manufacturing site.A visual inspection of the part was conducted and damage to the thread was observed.This damage was most probably caused due to the forceful separation of the part and the impactor tool.Due to the damage and contamination on the thread a dimensional inspection could not be completed on the part, therefore the thread could not be verified as to whether it was conforming to the required specification.Conclusion: the failure mode was determined to be ¿unable to separate impactor tool from cup.¿ due to no similar failures found in the dhr (device history record) review, inability to confirm root cause due to damage of the thread during forced separation of the part from the impactor tool, and no similar complaints within an 18-month period, the root cause of the complaint cannot be determined.No information received with this individual complaint indicated that a broader investigation or corrective action was necessary.Depuy synthes considers the investigation closed at this time.Should additional information be received, the information will be reviewed and the investigation may be re-opened as necessary.The complaint shall be closed with an undetermined conclusion; entered into the complaints database and monitored through trend analysis.Post market surveillance is per sep 419.Device history lot : null.Device history batch : null.Device history review : null.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Product complaint #: (b)(4).Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provision of 21 cfr, part 803.The report may be based on the information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Additional narrative: corrected: device evaluated by mfr.Product complaint #(b)(4).Investigation summary: the device was reviewed by the manufacturer and root cause was concluded as undetermined.Depuy synthes considers the investigation closed at this time.Should additional information be received, the information will be reviewed and the investigation may be re-opened as necessary.Device history lot: null.Device history batch: null.Device history review: null.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|