Model Number 9-ACP2-010-025 |
Device Problem
Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size (1583)
|
Patient Problem
Pericardial Effusion (3271)
|
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Further information regarding this event has been requested.The results/method and conclusion codes along with investigation results will be provided in a subsequent submission.
|
|
Event Description
|
On an unknown date, a amplatzer occluder (model unknown) was implanted.Following implant, the patient experienced a chronic pericardial effusion.The physician suspects the device may have been oversized.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This device is not fda approved.
|
|
Event Description
|
On an unknown date, a 22mm amplatzer amulet (lot number: 6494125) was implanted.Following implant, an echo revealed that the device was not fully compressed and the physician elected to exchange the device for a 25mm amplatzer amulet.The device did not appear to be fully compressed; however, a successful tug test was performed and the physician elected to release device.1 month following implant, the patient experienced a chronic pericardial effusion due to the device.The patient is reported to be stable.The physician suspects the device may have been oversized.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
An event of chronic pericardial effusion was reported.The results of the investigation are inconclusive since the device remains implanted was not returned for analysis.The device history record was reviewed to ensure that each manufacturing and inspection operation was performed and the product met all specifications at the time of commercialization.Based on the information received, the cause of the reported incident could not be conclusively determined.
|
|
Event Description
|
On an unknown date, a 22mm amplatzer amulet (lot number: 6494125) was implanted.Following implant, an echo revealed that the device was not fully compressed and the physician elected to exchange the device for a 25mm amplatzer amulet.The device did not appear to be fully compressed; however, a successful tug test was performed and the physician elected to release device.1 month following implant, the patient experienced a chronic pericardial effusion due to the device.The effusion was treated with medication and the patient is reported to be stable.The physician suspects the device may have been oversized.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|