• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TORAX MEDICAL, INC. UNK LINX MAGNETIC IMPLANT; ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TORAX MEDICAL, INC. UNK LINX MAGNETIC IMPLANT; ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNK LINX MAGNETIC IMPLANT
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Chest Pain (1776); Dysphagia/ Odynophagia (1815); Vomiting (2144); Obstruction/Occlusion (2422); No Code Available (3191)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Date of event: unknown.(b)(4).The lot was not provided; therefore, the manufacturing records could not be reviewed.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.
 
Event Description
It was reported via journal article: title: short-term outcomes using magnetic sphincter augmentation versus nissen fundoplication for medically resistant gastroesophageal reflux disease.Authors: brian e.Louie, md, alexander s.Farivar, md, dale shultz, bs, christina brennan, ccrp, eric vallieres, md, and ralph w.Aye, md.Citation: ann thorac surg (2014); 98:498¿505.Doi: http://dx.Doi.Org/10.1016/j.Athoracsur.2014.04.074.The authors evaluated their experience with magnetic sphincter augmentation (msa) and compared it with laparoscopic nissen fundoplication (lnf) at 6 months.A retrospective case-control study was performed on 34 consecutive patients (msa group; 18 male and 16 female; mean age:54 ±11.8 years; bmi: 27 ±5.1 kg/m2) who underwent laparoscopic implantation of a magnetic sphincter for chronic gastrointestinal esophageal disease (gerd) and a hiatal hernia of less than 3 cm from september 2012 to december 2013.For comparison, a review of 32 patients (lnf group; 13 male and 19 female; mean age: 47±12.2; bmi:30±4.4 kg/m2), who underwent laparoscopic nissen fundoplication (lnf), that were identified from a prospectively maintained benign esophageal surgical database from january 2010 to july 2013.During lnf, once a 3cm of intraabdominal esophagus was established, the esophageal hiatus was closed with single ¿0¿ polyester sutures (ethicon).In magnetic sphincter augmentation (msa), the appropriately sized linx device (ethicon) was situated in the tunnel and around the esophagus, and the sutures were secured using a suture-securing device.Reported complications in the lnf group included esophageal obstruction (n-1) in which a suture was removed from the hiatal closure and was discharged without further sequelae, swallowing ability worsened at 6 weeks (n-?), symptomatic esophageal spasms (n-2) requiring medical therapy, and esophagitis (n-1).Reported complications in the msa group included swallowing ability worsened at 6 weeks (n-?), food bolus impaction (n-1) requiring evaluation, but no invasive treatment, dysphagia (n-1) in which the patient underwent endoscopic balloon dilation, esophagitis with an elevated demeester score (n-4), heart burn (n-3), regurgitataion (n-6), cough (n-27), aspiration (n-28), and chest pain (n-25).In conclusion, msa results in similar objective control of gerd, symptom resolution, and improved quality of life compared with lnf.Msa seems to restore a more physiologic sphincter that allows physiologic reflux, facilitates belching, and creates less bloating and flatulence.This device has the potential to allow individualized treatment of patients with gerd and increase the surgical treatment of gerd.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNK LINX MAGNETIC IMPLANT
Type of Device
ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
TORAX MEDICAL, INC.
4188 lexington avenue north
shoreview MN
Manufacturer Contact
milt garrett
4188 lexington avenue north
shoreview, MN 
MDR Report Key9005851
MDR Text Key161088626
Report Number3008766073-2019-00442
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LEI
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P100049
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type literature
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 08/15/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNK LINX MAGNETIC IMPLANT
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 08/15/2019
Initial Date FDA Received09/12/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-