The reason for this revision surgery was due to pain.The previous surgery and the surgery detailed in this event occurred 5.2 years apart.This evaluation is limited in scope as the item associated with this investigation was not returned to djo surgical - austin for examination.The surgery was completed as intended and without incident.If additional information regarding the reported event is submitted at a future date, this investigation will be re-evaluated.A review of the device history record(s) show that the reported component used in the previous surgery, when released for use, met design and manufacturing requirements.There were no nonconforming material reports associated with the product that may have contributed to the reported event.The device was verified to have gone through an acceptable sterilization process and was within its expiration date at the time of the previous surgery.Customer complaint history of the reported device showed no present trends or on-going issues that are needing a review.The root cause of this complaint was a revision surgery due to pain.There were no findings during this evaluation that indicate that the reported device was defective.No information was submitted with the complaint regarding pre-existing conditions of the patient or any activities the patient was involved in that may have contributed to the event.There are multiple factors that may contribute to an event that are outside of the control of djo surgical.There are no indications of a product or process issue affecting implant safety or effectiveness.
|
Revision surgery - patient underwent left total elbow arthroplasty.Patient underwent a revision procedure in due to pain, decreased function and poly wear.During the revision surgery; the surgeon found the humeral condyle kit and bearings to be damaged, and severe catastrophic wear of the ulnar component.
|