• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTERSTIM II; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTERSTIM II; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE Back to Search Results
Model Number 3058
Device Problems Inappropriate/Inadequate Shock/Stimulation (1574); Inadequate Instructions for Non-Healthcare Professional (2956); Data Problem (3196)
Patient Problems Pain (1994); Electric Shock (2554)
Event Date 08/01/2019
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Event date is approximate.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Information was received from a consumer regarding a patient who was implanted with an implantable neurostimulator (ins) for urinary dysfunction/sacral nerve stimulation and gastrointestinal/pelvic floor.It was reported that the patient had been trying to use the programmer and it hadn¿t been working properly for a couple of weeks.The patient stated they put the programmer on the implant and it went to 6.7 volts and they got a shock to the vaginal area and they were in pain for weeks.The patient then later stated they were on program 2 at 2.3 volts and the stimulation went up to 7.3 volts and really hurt, that was a couple of weeks ago.Syncing with the ins showed the stimulation was on at 2.3 volts on program 2.The patient kept pressing the navigation key and they would see the other programs: program 1 at 4.9 volts and program 3 at 6.1 volts.It was explained that they weren¿t actually on the program if they didn¿t have a check mark, and the ones without check marks are just other options they would change to.The patient increased to 2.4 volts while on the call and stated it was comfortable.The patient was advised to stay on that setting for a couple of days and see if they got relief, and to decrease stimulation if it gets uncomfortable.It was noted that the patient received inadequate training.No further complications were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Follow up information received from the patient reported that there were no circumstances that led to the issue.As a step taken to resolve the issue, the patient stated ¿a new program of 2:30?¿.They mentioned that, overall, they were not satisfied with the manufacturer¿s product as they got little bladder relief since it ¿has been inserted¿.The patient indicate that they had ¿no backup¿ from their urologist (¿had enough and being on the phone to supervise #¿s¿).There were no further complications reported or anticipated.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INTERSTIM II
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
lisa woodward clark
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263920
MDR Report Key9070032
MDR Text Key164610372
Report Number3004209178-2019-17682
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code EZW
UDI-Device Identifier00613994913654
UDI-Public00613994913654
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970004
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/25/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date12/14/2018
Device Model Number3058
Device Catalogue Number3058
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/04/2019
Initial Date FDA Received09/16/2019
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received10/29/2019
Supplement Dates FDA Received11/25/2019
Date Device Manufactured06/21/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age77 YR
Patient Weight57
-
-