|
Catalog Number LXMC15 |
Device Problem
Device Damaged by Another Device (2915)
|
Patient Problem
No Code Available (3191)
|
Event Date 09/04/2019 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Date sent: 09/24/2019.Attempts have been made to retrieve the device.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.The lot was not provided; therefore, the manufacturing record evaluation could not be performed.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: what is the lot number for the linx device? na.Was ph testing performed prior to explant to confirm recurrent reflux? no.After implant, was the device initially effective in controlling reflux? yes.When did the recurrent reflux begin? month before explant.What symptoms lead to the discovery of the discontinuous device? reflux.When did they begin? month prior to explant.What was the date of the imaging which showed the discontinuous linx? a week prior to the explant.Were any events associated with the onset of symptoms (vomiting, retching, trauma, surgery)? no.Did the patient undergo an mri since device implant? if so, when was the mri and what strength? no.Did the patient have any other surgeries in the area? na.Was any additional imaging performed since device implant? no.Does the device appear to be in a continuous annular state in these images? we are interested in establishing a window when the device may have become discontinuous.Please share any additional images.It was reported that after explant a similar device was implanted.Please provide the product code and lot number for the replacement device.I need to retrieve that from the hospital.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that post implant of the lxmc15 the wire pulled out of one of the beads and the patient gerd symptoms returned.The device was explanted on (b)(6) 2019 with no patient consequences.A similar device was implanted.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Date sent: 11/21/2019.Device analysis: an x-ray of the device in a discontinuous was received.Visual analysis was consistent with an explanted device, and link length and tensile force (with the exception of the extra peaks due to bent wires) were found to meet the applicable specifications.The remaining device characteristics show no anomalies for a device that has been reasonably changed as part of the explant procedure.Analysis found that the returned device had an exposed weld ball visible paired with the washer side of the adjacent bead.The washer through hole was measured with computed tomography and found to be out of specification.The paired weld ball diameter was found to meet specifications.Overall review of the device function and dimensions, excluding the out of specification washer hole, show no anomalies from a device that has been reasonably changed as part of the explant procedure.It was noted that bent wires and bead toggle resulted in small force peaks between bead separations.As the device was tested to 250g tensile force in production, it is presumed that a certain geometric combination of the weld ball and the washer hole resulted in the device separation in vivo.The lot number is unknown; therefore, the dhr could not be reviewed.Based on the date of implant ((b)(6) 2016), the device is an affected lot of the 2018 linx recall.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|