The product catalog and lot number of the device involved in this event were not made available.As a result, a review of the quality and manufacturing records for the involved product lot could not be carried out.The patient did not provide contact information for the involved physicians.Therefore, additional patient information regarding their clinical course could not be received.Finally, the involved device was not available for evaluation.Hence, no investigation into this occurrence could be performed.If additional information is received in the future, this file will be re-opened for assessment/ investigation and updated accordingly.
|
Feedback received from patient via medwatch report (mw5088744).According to the information received, the subject received a cartiva implant on (b)(6) 2019.The reason for the surgical procedure was unspecified.Approximately 6 to 8 months postoperative, the patient developed severe pain the in the operated area.Following, the subject visited with the involved podiatrist, where electromagnetic images exhibited signs of implant subsidence.The subject reported their orthopedic surgeon commenting that the implant had "fallen apart".The implant was removed and the patient was revised to fusion on (b)(6) 2019.The patient's contact information, product catalog and lot numbers, contact information for the involved physician, nor additional details regarding this event were made available.
|