(b)(4).A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device product code w810t lot kl5dgjm, and no non-conformance were identified.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.The following information was requested, but unavailable: the patient demographic info: age, gender, weight, bmi at the time of index procedure date and name of index surgical procedure.The diagnosis and indication for the index surgical procedure? other relevant history / concomitant medications, please clarify ¿the use of bone wax was suspected to be problematic¿? where was the device used? does the physician believe there was there any alleged deficiency with the ethicon device? what is the physician¿s opinion as to the etiology of or contributing factors to this event? if applicable, will the product be returned for evaluation? what is the patient¿s current status?.
|
It was reported that the patient underwent lumbar vertebral fracture surgery on an unknown date and bone wax was used.A week following the procedure, the patient experienced erythema and inflammation.The position of the fixator was normal by imaging examination, and the use of bone wax was suspected to be problematic.The patient was given drainage and rehabilitation treatment.Then the patient's condition changed to better.
|