(b)(4).Attempts have been made to retrieve the device.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: what is the product code for the linx device? what symptoms lead to the discovery of the discontinuous device? when did they begin? what was the date of the imaging which showed the discontinuous linx? if available, please share a copy of this imaging.Please send the image to productcomplaint1@its.Jnj.Com.Was the device initially effective in controlling reflux? were any events associated with the onset of symptoms (vomiting, retching, trauma, surgery)? did the patient undergo an mri since device implant? if so, when was the mri and what strength? did the patient have any other surgeries in the area? was any additional imaging performed since device implant? does the device appear to be in a continuous annular state in these images? we are interested in establishing a window when the device may have become discontinuous.Please share any additional images.Response: patient gender: female, patient initials: (b)(6), date of birth: (b)(6), patient bmi or weight: 23.3.Date of implant: (b)(6) 2017, date of explant: (b)(6) 2019, implanting physician: dr.(b)(6), device size: 14-bead (clasp), lot: 12203.Did the patient have any of the following (autoimmune disease, allergy to metals, other metal implants ¿ orthopedic, cardiac, etc)? this question was not answered.Did the patient have any pre-existing dysphagia or other conditions (other than gerd)? no.Were there any intra-operative complications during implant? no.Was there a hiatal or crural repair done at the same time as the implant? yes.Was mesh used at time of implant? no.What was the reason for removal of the linx device? ongoing gerd symptoms.Was the device found in the correct position / geometry at the time of removal? no.Linx device was found to be in discontinuity intra-operatively.Was a replacement linx device used? no.A video of the explant was taken.The linx device was retained.Pre-implant information: which tests were performed per-implant? manometry, barium swallow, ph, egd.Results: video esophagram- small to moderate hiatal hernia, esophageal dysmotility.Em- ineffective esophageal motility, low les pressure, hiatal hernia.Dci 432.3.Egd- 3 cm hiatal hernia, hill grade 4 valve, no esophagitis.48 hr ph study, demeester scores: 52.4, 34.5.Additional diagnostic testing or intervention performed prior to removal: veg ((b)(6) 2018) - esophageal dysmotility, no gastroesophageal reflux, no hiatal hernia.Linx intact.Egd ((b)(6) 2018) - la grade b esophagitis, 2 cm hiatal hernia.Ct chest ((b)(6) 2019) - linx is disconnected on imaging (radiologist did not report).Ct abdomen/pelvis ((b)(6) 2019) - linx device for management of gastroesophageal reflux at ge junction has separated with a gap measuring approximately 1.3 cm.Surgical consultation is indicated.
|