• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TORAX MEDICAL, INC. UNK LINX MAGNETIC IMPLANT; ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TORAX MEDICAL, INC. UNK LINX MAGNETIC IMPLANT; ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNK LINX MAGNETIC IMPLANT
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Pain (1994); Discomfort (2330); No Code Available (3191)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Date sent: 10/01/2019.Date of event: unknown.The lot was not provided; therefore, the manufacturing records could not be reviewed.
 
Event Description
It was reported via journal article: title: crural closure improves outcomes of magnetic sphincter augmentation in gerd patients with hiatal hernia.Author: katrin schwameis, milena nikolic, deivis g.Morales castellano, ariane steindl, sarah macheck, m.Riegler, ivan kristo , barbara zorner & sebastian f.Schoppmann.Citation: scientific reports (2018) 8:7319; doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24322-1.This retrospective study aimed to assess if hiatal repair in magnetic sphincter-augmentation (msa) patients significantly influences postoperative outcomes including reflux control and dysphagia rate.Between march 2012 and mar 2017, a total of 68 patients (n=46 males, n=22 females; median age of 45 years, range of 38-58) were included in the study.The patients were classified into 3 groups: ¿no hiatal hernia¿ (nhh) (n=16), ¿hiatal repair¿ (hr) (n=26) and ¿no hiatal repair¿ (nhr) (n=26) group.The surgical approach was laparoscopic in all cases.After mobilization of the esophagogastric junction, the adequate ring size was measured with the sizing tool and the magnetic device (linx reflux management system, ethicon) was wrapped around the lower end of the lower esophageal sphincter.Complaint included retrosternal pain (n=1 from hr group) and discomfort (n=1 from nhr group).The device was explanted in both patients due to the events.Additional complaint of rare difficulties swallowing solids (n = 14) and occasional difficulties with swallowing solids (n = 11) were reported.Magnetic lower esophageal sphincter (les) augmentation leads to significant gastrointestinal symptom relief, increased gerd-specific quality of life and good alimentary satisfaction with low perioperative morbidity rates.In patients with hiatal hernia, crural closure tends to result in better reflux control and gerd symptom relief compared to exclusive msa without increasing postoperative dysphagia rates.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNK LINX MAGNETIC IMPLANT
Type of Device
ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
TORAX MEDICAL, INC.
4188 lexington avenue north
shoreview MN
Manufacturer Contact
milt garrett
4188 lexington avenue north
shoreview, MN 
MDR Report Key9141929
MDR Text Key163599928
Report Number3008766073-2019-00499
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LEI
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeIT
PMA/PMN Number
P100049
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,literature
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 09/19/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNK LINX MAGNETIC IMPLANT
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/19/2019
Initial Date FDA Received10/01/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-