H10: manufacturing review: a lot history review was conducted and it was determined that a device history record (dhr) review was not required.Investigation summary: the device was returned for evaluation.A visual inspection was performed and no anomalies were noted to the device.The device was connected to an in house pressure gauge and attempted to be pressurized.The pressure was increased but the pressure gauge on the device remained at 0.No glue was seen blocking the pressure gauge.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the reported pressure gauge issue, as the pressure gauge would not increase when the device was under pressure.The definitive root cause for the reported pressure gauge issue could not be determined based upon available information.Labeling review: the review of the ifu (instructions for use), indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, and contraindications showed that the product labeling is adequate.H11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|