• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ORTHO-CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS VITROS IMMUNODIAGNOSTIC PRODUCTS ANTI-HBS REAGENT PACK; IN VITRO DIAGNOSTICS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ORTHO-CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS VITROS IMMUNODIAGNOSTIC PRODUCTS ANTI-HBS REAGENT PACK; IN VITRO DIAGNOSTICS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 6801925
Device Problem False Positive Result (1227)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 09/08/2019
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation has determined that discordant reactive vitros (b)(6)results were obtained from two different samples from a single patient using vitros immunodiagnostic products (b)(6) reagent lot 3310 in combination with a vitros 3600 immunodiagnostic system.The results were discordant when compared to (b)(6) results obtained from two different non-vitros methods.A definitive assignable cause for the discordant vitros results could not be determined with the information provided.Based on historical quality control (qc) results, a vitros (b)(6) reagent performance issue is not a likely contributor to the event as all qc fluid results were within expectations.In addition, continual tracking and trending of complaints has not identified any signals that would point to a potential systemic issue with vitros (b)(6) reagent lot 3310.Precision testing was not conducted on the vitros 3600 immunodiagnostic system therefore, an instrument related issue could not be entirely ruled out as a contributor to the event.However, there is no indication of an instrument malfunction.Additionally, pre-analytical sample processing cannot be ruled out as a contributing factor.The customer was not following the sample collection device manufacturer¿s recommended centrifugation protocol.It is possible that cellular debris, due to poor sample preparation, was present in the affected samples, although this could not be confirmed.Furthermore, the presence of an unknown sample interferent cannot be completely ruled out as the cause of the discordant reactive vitros results as no sample volume remained available to test using blocking tubes.
 
Event Description
A customer reported two false (b)(6) vitros (b)(6) patient sample results from a single patient using vitros immunodiagnostic products (b)(6)reagent on a vitros 3600 immunodiagnostic system.The results were discordant when compared to negative results obtained from two different non-vitros methods.Patient sample results of > 1000 and > 1000 miu/ml (reactive) versus the expected result of negative.Biased results of the magnitude and direction observed may lead to inappropriate physician action if they were to occur undetected.The higher than expected reactive vitros (b)(6) results were not reported from the laboratory and ortho has not been made aware of any allegation of patient harm as a result of this event.This report corresponds to ortho clinical diagnostics inc.Complaint number (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VITROS IMMUNODIAGNOSTIC PRODUCTS ANTI-HBS REAGENT PACK
Type of Device
IN VITRO DIAGNOSTICS
Manufacturer (Section D)
ORTHO-CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS
100 indigo creek drive
rochester NY 14626
Manufacturer (Section G)
ORTHO CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS
felindre meadows
pencoed
bridgend, wales CF35 5PZ
UK   CF35 5PZ
Manufacturer Contact
james a stevens
100 indigo creek drive
rochester, NY 14626
5854533000
MDR Report Key9218869
MDR Text Key220781320
Report Number3007111389-2019-00163
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LOM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeFR
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,o
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 10/22/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/06/2019
Device Catalogue Number6801925
Device Lot Number3310
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/27/2019
Initial Date FDA Received10/22/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/01/2019
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-