• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ROTALINK PLUS; CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ROTALINK PLUS; CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY Back to Search Results
Model Number 3241
Device Problem Infusion or Flow Problem (2964)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 09/05/2019
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that blood came out from the burr tip and shaft.The 90% stenosed target lesion was located in the severely calcified artery.Post ablation, the 1.50mm burr was taken removed from the patient's body and imaging was performed.Subsequently, additional ablation using the 1.50mm was considered after imaging.However, there were no saline flow from the burr and driving shaft when the burr was tried to advance inside the body along with the wire.The pressure bag was checked, 300psi, the drip line was opened, and there was no abnormality observed on the line connection.The syringe was reconnected in the cocktail line.Blood was then noted coming out from the burr tip and shaft when flushing was performed forcibly.The procedure was completed with a new burr.No complications were reported and patient condition was good.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluated by manufacturer: the device was returned for analysis.The returned complaint device consisted of a rotablator rotalink plus device.The advancer, handshake connection, sheath, coil, burr and annulus were microscopically examined.Microscopic examination of the device revealed that the annulus was damaged/fish-mouthed which is consistent with damage seen with the use of a rotawire.The coil is stretched.Functional testing was performed by attempting to rotate the drive shaft, however, it was unable to rotate.Product analysis confirmed the reported event due to the melted ultem.Inspection of the remainder of the device presented no other damage or irregularities.There was no evidence of any material or manufacturing deficiencies contributing to the damage and the reported event.
 
Event Description
It was reported that blood came out from the burr tip and shaft.The 90% stenosed target lesion was located in the severely calcified artery.Post ablation, the 1.50mm burr was taken removed from the patient's body and imaging was performed.Subsequently, additional ablation using the 1.50mm was considered after imaging.However, there were no saline flow from the burr and driving shaft when the burr was tried to advance inside the body along with the wire.The pressure bag was checked, 300psi, the drip line was opened, and there was no abnormality observed on the line connection.The syringe was reconnected in the cocktail line.Blood was then noted coming out from the burr tip and shaft when flushing was performed forcibly.The procedure was completed with a new burr.No complications were reported and patient condition was good.
 
Event Description
It was reported that blood came out from the burr tip and shaft.The 90% stenosed target lesion was located in the severely calcified artery.Post ablation, the 1.50mm burr was taken removed from the patient's body and imaging was performed.Subsequently, additional ablation using the 1.50mm was considered after imaging.However, there were no saline flow from the burr and driving shaft when the burr was tried to advance inside the body along with the wire.The pressure bag was checked, 300psi, the drip line was opened, and there was no abnormality observed on the line connection.The syringe was reconnected in the cocktail line.Blood was then noted coming out from the burr tip and shaft when flushing was performed forcibly.The procedure was completed with a new burr.No complications were reported and patient condition was good.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluated by manufacturer: the device was returned for analysis.The returned complaint device consisted of a rotablator rotalink plus device.The burr catheter was received attached to the advancer unit.There is blood in the housing.The advancer, handshake connection, sheath, coil, burr and annulus were microscopically examined.Microscopic examination of the device revealed that the annulus was damaged/fish-mouthed which is consistent with damage seen with the use of a rotawire.The coil is stretched.Functional testing was performed by attempting to rotate the drive shaft, however, it was unable to rotate.Product analysis confirmed the reported event due to the melted ultem.Functional testing was performed by hooking the rotablator plus device to a pressurized bag of water.The water was flushed quickly through the entire length of the sheath exiting the distal end of the sheath with no leaks or issues.Inspection of the remainder of the device presented no other damage or irregularities.There was no evidence of any material or manufacturing deficiencies contributing to the damage and the reported event.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ROTALINK PLUS
Type of Device
CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
two scimed place
maple grove MN 55311
MDR Report Key9252018
MDR Text Key165422492
Report Number2134265-2019-13087
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MCX
UDI-Device Identifier08714729228363
UDI-Public08714729228363
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P900056
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 12/06/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number3241
Device Catalogue Number3241
Device Lot Number0023999520
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/14/2019
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/07/2019
Initial Date FDA Received10/29/2019
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received11/01/2019
11/25/2019
Supplement Dates FDA Received11/20/2019
12/06/2019
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-