Generator analysis was approved and reviewed.The generator was replaced and returned due to prophylactic reason.The device performed according to functional specifications and analysis of the generator in product analysis (pa) lab concluded that there were no abnormal performance or any other type of adverse condition existing for the generator.The pa worksheet was reviewed and no anomalies were found.Lead analysis was approved and reviewed.Lead was explanted and returned due to fracture of leads however this was not confirmed in pa lab.During visual analysis, abraded openings were observed on the outer and inner silicone tubes.The quadfilar coils appeared to be exposed in this area.With the exception of the abraded openings observed on the outer and inner silicone tubes, the condition of the returned lead portions is consistent with conditions that typically exist following an explant procedure.No other anomalies were noted.Setscrew marks found on the lead connector pin provide evidence that at one point in time, a good mechanical and electrical connection were present.Continuity checks of the lead were performed and no discontinuities were observed in the returned parts of the lead.Based on the findings in pa lab, there is evidence to suggest inner tubing abraded openings in the returned part of the device with the cause of wear, however there was no evidence to suggest any fracture of leads.Note that since the electrode array section was not returned for analysis, an evaluation and resulting commentary cannot be made on that portion of the lead.No additional relevant information has been received to date.
|