• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC NAVIGATION, INC (LITTLETON) O-ARM 1000 IMAGING SYSTEM; IMAGE-INTENSIFIED FLUOROSCOPIC X-RAY SYSTEM, MOBILE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC NAVIGATION, INC (LITTLETON) O-ARM 1000 IMAGING SYSTEM; IMAGE-INTENSIFIED FLUOROSCOPIC X-RAY SYSTEM, MOBILE Back to Search Results
Model Number BI70000027100
Device Problem Imprecision (1307)
Patient Problem Tissue Damage (2104)
Event Date 10/03/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information regarding an imaging system.It was reported that during a sacroiliac and thoracolumbar (lower/mid spine) there were issues with screw placement and there were not enough extenders.Percutaneous pedicle screw (pss) fixation was performed with "e5" using an imaging system and a navigation system.Fixation was performed at "th3/8" (interpreted as thoracic vertebrae level 3 through 8).(because left pedicle of th5 was fractured, so it was skipped.) a total of eleven screws were scheduled to be inserted, but there were only eight e5 extenders.Therefore, with the imaging system navigation, five screws on the left side and screws on the right side at th4 and th6 were inserted, and a distraction force by the trauma device was applied to the fractured vertebral body th5.On the left side, rods and plugs were placed and final tightening was performed, and the trauma device and extender were removed.After that, images were taken by the imaging system with the extender upright at th4 and th6 on the right side, and t he remaining screws were inserted under the navigation.When images were taken again by the imaging system to check for screw deviation, the th5 and th7 screws (the defective products this time) had deviated inward.Inserting the screws again was attempted, but the pilot hole was already loose, so the rod was placed and final tightening was performed without implantation and the procedure was completed.There was a delay to the procedure of less than one hour.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information received from a manufacturer representative (confirmed via healthcare provider) indicated the th5 and th7 pedicle screws on the right side deviated toward the spinal canal.There was no alleged issue with the screws.The screw deviation was clarified to be an inaccuracy of approximately 2 to 2 mm.The patient reference frame was reportedly placed in th3.There was the possibility the screw deviation was due to inaccuracy or the patient anatomy.Furthermore, there was no possibility that the spine stability issue was due to not having the expected amount of extenders.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H3: a software analysis was initiated.However, the software evaluation found that a probable cause was unable to be determined.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
O-ARM 1000 IMAGING SYSTEM
Type of Device
IMAGE-INTENSIFIED FLUOROSCOPIC X-RAY SYSTEM, MOBILE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC NAVIGATION, INC (LITTLETON)
300 foster st
littleton MA 01460
MDR Report Key9275298
MDR Text Key167345813
Report Number3004785967-2019-01914
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OXO
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K050996
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 01/15/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator No Information
Device Model NumberBI70000027100
Device Catalogue NumberBI70000027100
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/08/2019
Initial Date FDA Received11/04/2019
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received11/10/2019
11/10/2019
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/05/2019
01/15/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-