Model Number CI-28 |
Device Problems
Insufficient Information (3190); Device Handling Problem (3265)
|
Patient Problems
Eye Injury (1845); No Code Available (3191)
|
Event Date 10/02/2019 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device has not been returned for evaluation.Investigation of this event is in progress.Upon completion of the investigation, a follow up report will be submitted.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that an intraoperative exchange on the left eye took place due to the trailing haptic of the initial intraocular lens (iol) being cut in half by the insertion device during iol implantation.The incision was enlarged almost as wide as the optic in order to remove the iol prior to lens exchange.A suture was placed after the intraoperative lens exchange.In the surgeon's opinion, the likely cause of the event was the insertion device cut off the trailing haptic of the optic.The patient has recovered.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information: additional visual inspection was completed for this event.The investigation team inspected 3 retain inserters from lot h956901l under 10x-20x magnification.All retain samples showed no presence of particulate or flash in the lens path that could have caused any damage to the lens in the manner described in the event.Based on the results of the visual inspection performed on the lens, the three retain inserters from lot h953502, and the information provided by the account rep, no issues were observed that can confirm the description of the reported event.The results showed that the inserters were assembled for intended use and shipped with no damages and packaged as intended to keep good condition for use.The additional information does not change the investigation findings submitted in the previous report.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information: the product was not returned for evaluation.The lot history, trend analysis, risk analysis and directions for use review are considered acceptable, with the product performing within anticipated rates.There have been no other complaints for this lot to date.The duovisc viscoelastic used is not validated for use with b&l products, therefore the most probable root cause is "operational context".User related factors (such as loading or handling techniques) and/or procedural factors (such as lens and inserter interaction) might have contributed to the event.No corrective action is necessary at this time.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|