• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MAKO SURGICAL CORP. 3.0 RIO® ROBOTIC ARM - MICS; STEREOTAXIC DEVICE, ROBOTICS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MAKO SURGICAL CORP. 3.0 RIO® ROBOTIC ARM - MICS; STEREOTAXIC DEVICE, ROBOTICS Back to Search Results
Model Number 209999
Device Problems Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings (1535); Output Problem (3005)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 09/07/2019
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
As part of the normal complaint follow-up, an evaluation of the event has been initiated by mako surgical.A supplemental report will be submitted when additional information becomes available.
 
Event Description
X-ray film shown not acceptable cup position which system shown 41/19 cup plane.Case type: tka.
 
Event Description
X-ray film shown not acceptable cup position which system shown 41/19 cup plane.Case type: tka.Update: "patient was under anesthesia.".
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Reported event: an event regarding software error involving 3.0 rio® robotic arm - mics, catalog: 209999 was reported.It was reported ¿x-ray film shown not acceptable cup position which system shown 41/19 cup plane.¿ method & results: product evaluation and results: review of the provided session logs/case files provided the following information: areas of investigation: checkpoints; pelvic registration; post-op x-ray.Checkpoints: the recorded checkpoint value is not acceptable.The checkpoint value is 24.5mm during impaction.Pelvic registration: outlier rejection was triggered in both attempts.2 outliers were rejected in the first attempt and 4 outliers in the last attempt.Surgeon passed all verification points except one in the last attempt.For the first attempt, the initial registration result shows rotational error based on the significantly moved fossa points (point 15 and 16) and the two horseshoe groups.The rim points also rotated into the osteophytes.After fine (surface) registration, the points significantly rotated compared to the initial registration result.The surface points collected seems not covering enough feature to lock rotation and resulting in the lower rms error.For the last attempt, the initial registration result shows rotational error too based on the moved fossa points (point 15 and 16).After fine (surface) registration, the points also significantly changed compared to the initial registration result.Larger inclination change was observed that the anterior horseshoe points (point 1-4) moved superiorly.In conclusion, both registrations demonstrated rotational error, which might be due to avoiding the superior osteophytes.In the last attempt, significant inclination change was observed, which indicates bad registration that could lead to noticeable inclination and version errors.Post-op x-ray: based on the post-op x-ray, the inclination is only 15 degrees which is far away from the reported 41 degrees.Product history review: review of the device history records associated with rio 220 indicate quality inspection procedures were completed with no reported discrepancies.Complaint history review: a search of the complaint database under device identification (b)(4) reports similar complaints for tha software - software error.The complaints are pr: (b)(4).Conclusions: based on the above analysis, the bone registration contributes to the error of cup orientation.The logged checkpoint values in cup impaction is off as well, which indicates the array was bumped during the case.No additional investigation or specific actions are required at this time.If additional information is received such as the session files, then the complaint will be reopened.Corrective action/preventive action: a search of the nc/capa database under device identification (b)(4) reports no records related to tha software - software error.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
3.0 RIO® ROBOTIC ARM - MICS
Type of Device
STEREOTAXIC DEVICE, ROBOTICS
Manufacturer (Section D)
MAKO SURGICAL CORP.
2555 davie road
fort lauderdale FL 33317
MDR Report Key9280346
MDR Text Key165122988
Report Number3005985723-2019-00790
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OLO
UDI-Device Identifier00848486030407
UDI-Public00848486030407
Combination Product (y/n)N
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/21/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number209999
Device Catalogue Number209999
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/07/2019
Initial Date FDA Received11/05/2019
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received04/06/2020
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/21/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization;
-
-