The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, trend analysis, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), and applicable fmea documents.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint of an incorrect priming volume indicated on the arterial lumen clamp was confirmed and the cause appeared to be manufacturing-related.The product returned for evaluation was one photograph which depicted a 20cm niagara acute dialysis catheter.The depicted device was implanted, with the molded joint, extension tubes and luer adapters visible.The blue clamp indicated a priming volume of 1.4ml and the red clamp indicated a priming volume of 1.8ml.The arterial lumen clamp marking indicated a priming volume of 1.8ml; however, the clamp should indicate a volume of 1.4ml per the applicable device drawing.It appeared that the device was assembled with the wrong clamp or an incorrectly marked clamp.The received photograph has been forwarded to the manufacturing site for further evaluation.Reynosa evaluation.Complaint due to ¿id tag was wrong¿ was confirmed, according with photo evaluation performed at reynosa facility and photo evaluation performed by vad field assurance it was concluded that a wrong id tag was assembled on clamp during the manufacturing process.Therefore, the cause of this condition is manufacturing related.A lot history review (lhr) of recx2877 showed no other similar product complaint(s) from this lot number.
|