Customer reported a (b)(6) year-old female patient with skin type 2 had intense pulsed light (ipl) photo facial on (b)(6) 2019.Following treatment, patient showed minimal erythema on all areas other than nose which showed mild erythema.Customer reports that the patient emailed trilogy medical center on (b)(6) 2019 with a complaint about a burn on right cheek bone area and concerned that it may be infected.The patient contacted an rn in her area (she lives out-of-state) and was prescribed mupirocin ointment 4 times daily for 10 days.The trilogy treatment provider sent customer elta laser enzyme gel to use am/pm until burn heals and reminded patient to wear daily spf and avoid sun exposure.Customer reports burn will heal but is predicted to scar.This was the patient's third treatment, most recent prior treatment was (b)(6) 2019 with no adverse reactions.No reported recent sun exposure.Test spot was performed with 16j, 22rf.
|
Field service engineer evaluated unit in response to the reported patient impact and found unit to be operating within specifications with no faults or problems identified.Reported treatment parameters are within guidelines; however, not all parameters were reported.Customer did not use the (b)(6) supplied coupling gel.The elos plus system user manual provides the following warning: only use coupling gel supplied by (b)(6).Coupling gels from other manufacturers may perform inadequately and may be the cause of damage to the patient's skin.Because the reported adverse event is known and documented in the labeling (including both short or long term known complications or adverse reactions), the complaint conclusion is known inherent risk of device.No new risks or hazards identified with this complaint.
|