Patient was experiencing feedback that is consistent with electrical feedback.The device was demonstrating feedback similar to other confirmed cases of electrical feedback and there is no reason to believe that feed back was mechanical in nature.Based on available test and diagnostic data, the source of the feed back cannot be conclusively identified as there is no visual evidence of the previously alleged header abrasion issue, known to cause electrical feedback in similar cases.Therefore no root cause could be identified for this case.
|
Envoy medical corp.(emc) was notified on 05/29/2019 that a patient was experiencing low frequency feed back, with a feedback test abnormal at 250-500 hz.This low freq feedback prevented proper programming.Test results were consistent with electrical feedback.The alleged issue could not be confirmed until a battery replacement procedure could be performed and the appropriate testing could be performed to confirm efficacy of the device.Following the battery change procedure, the patient's esteem diagnostics were within range.Patient no longer experiences gain / feed back limitations and is meeting nal/rp targets and wrs is consistent with baseline.Returned device evaluation was run successfully and visual inspection shows no evidence of previously alleged header abrasion.Root cause could not be determined utilizing available analysis/test methods.Patient/clinical history with emc: (b)(6) 2014- implant.(b)(6) 2014- activation.(b)(6) 2015- fitting.(b)(6) 2015- fitting.(b)(6) 2019- clinical review.(b)(6) 2019- fitting.(b)(6) 2019- battery change.(b)(6) 2019- post battery change fitting.
|