Model Number VASOVIEWHEMPRO (US) VH-3000 |
Device Problems
Fitting Problem (2183); Defective Component (2292)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 10/16/2019 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Trackwise id# (b)(4).A lot history record review was completed for the reported product lot number.There were no ncmr¿s for the reported lot number.The device has been returned to the factory and is being evaluated.A supplemental report will be submitted when the evaluation is completed.
|
|
Event Description
|
The hospital reported that during an endoscopic vein harvesting procedure, vasoview hemopro was hard to advance back and forth within the harvesting cannula.Upon inspection they noticed that one side of the jaws was shorter than the other by around 2mm.The case was completed without incident.The hospital did not report any patient effects.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Trackwise # (b)(4).The device was returned to the factory for evaluation on 10/21/2019.An investigation was conducted on 12/09/2019.A visual inspection was conducted.Signs of clinical use and slight evidence of blood was observed.The harvesting device was returned partially inside the cannula.Blood and charred tissue was observed on the heater wire.No visual defects were observed on the jaws.A reference hemopro device was used to measure the jaws, there were no visual defects observed.A mechanical evaluation was conducted.A reference endoscope was inserted into the cannula until the noticeable click was observed, with no difficulties observed.The test was repeated 3 (three) times with the same observations observed.Based on the returned condition of the device, the reported failures "fitting problem" and "defective component" was not confirmed.The dhr, shop floor paperwork was reviewed.The vendor certifies that this device lot conforms to all applicable product specifications.
|
|
Event Description
|
The hospital reported that during an endoscopic vein harvesting procedure, vasoview hemopro was hard to advance back and forth within the harvesting cannula.Upon inspection they noticed that one side of the jaws was shorter than the other by around 2mm.The case was completed without incident.The hospital did not report any patient effects.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|