One single dpt kit was returned for examination.The reported event of "inaccurate values" was not confirmed.The dpt zeroed and sensed pressure accurately on the patient monitor.The pressure did show drifting during output drift testing but met specification.Electrical testing showed that the dpt electronic components were intact because both input and output impedance were within specifications.Zero-offset also met specification.However, the zero-stopcock male luer had been broken and the broken luer was stuck inside of the mating pressure tubing female connector.Indications of what appeared to be bonding material were found on the broken luer.The px260 kit did not call for bonding between the zero-stopcock and pressure tubing female connector.No other visible damage was observed from the rest of the kit.An investigation has been initiated to consider any potential manufacturing factors that may have contributed to this complaint and implement any necessary corrective actions.A supplemental report will be forthcoming when the device history results are received.Poor dynamic response can be caused by air bubbles, clotting, and excessive lengths of tubing, excessively compliant pressure tubing, small bore tubing, loose connections, or leaks.The assembly may be tested for dynamic response by observing the pressure waveform on an oscilloscope or monitor.Bedside determination of the dynamic response of the catheter, monitor, kit and transducer system is done after the system is flushed, attached to the patient, zeroed and calibrated.A square-wave test may be performed by pulling the snap tab device and releasing quickly.Pressure readings can change quickly and dramatically because of loss of proper calibration, loose connection, or air in the system.Pressure readings should correlate with the patient¿s clinical manifestations.It is not known if user or procedural factors may have contributed to the stated event.In this event, there was no patient compromise noted.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as a part of the monthly review.
|