Device evaluation by manufacturer: the aquabeam scope was returned for investigation.Visual inspection confirmed that the scope broke in two (2) places, and a portion was not returned for investigation.The break was consistent with resistance translating the scope at the proximal end of the travel, causing the scope to buckle and break.A review of the cpu log file for this procedure was performed, which showed that the scope was retracted to the proximal position at 13:08:56 minutes.The scope did not reappear on the cpu screen.At 13:09:24 minutes the handpiece was removed from the patient and undocked from the motorpack.The cpu log file showed that the procedure was aborted.The scope is a purchased device, which passed receiving inspection.A review of the device history record (dhr) was performed and no anomalies were observed.The review indicated that the device met all required specifications when released for distribution.A review for similar complaints was performed on lot number 18c00997, which confirmed no other similar event have been reported on this lot.Similar events have been reported across other lots; however, in neither of the events the procedures were aborted.The aquabeam robotic system's instructions for use, ifu320301, revision d.Was reviewed and in the trus probe and aquabeam handpiece insertion section states: using the scope carriage, retract the aquabeam scope to sphincter and then advance scope proximal (towards the bladder neck), so that the scope tip adequately covers and protects the sphincter.However, the ifu did not include precautionary instructions if excessive resistance was encountered during repositioning of the aquabeam scope, which may have resulted in a damaged aquabeam scope.The reported event was confirmed during investigation of the returned aquabeam scope.The break was consistent with encountering resistance to translating the scope carriage at the proximal end of travel, causing the scope to buckle and break.The aquabeam robotic system's ifu are being updated to include the following statement: "precaution: if excessive resistance is encountered during aquabeam scope positioning, reposition the aquabeam handpiece to minimize tenting the prostate in order to reduce the chance of damaging the aquabeam scope." submission of this report does not constitute an admission that the manufacturer's product caused or contributed to the event.
|