• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS - HOUSTON PULSE GEN MODEL 1000; GENERATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS - HOUSTON PULSE GEN MODEL 1000; GENERATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 1000
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Chest Pain (1776); Dyspnea (1816); Inflammation (1932); Pain (1994); Seroma (2069)
Event Date 11/02/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported by the patient that the patient's vns was stimulating every ten seconds or so and that the patient was experiencing difficulty breathing.The patient was advised to present to the hospital by her neurologist.It was stated that the facility "reset" the generator.The patient then reported that it was going off less frequently, but still more than normal.The patient reported the vns stimulating when she had only stood up.An x-ray and ct scan were performed while the patient was at the hospital and it was noted that the generator seemed to be floating in a pocket of fluid.The patient reported still being in a lot of pain and felt that the vns was stimulating too frequently still.No additional relevant information has been received to date.
 
Event Description
It was later reported by a company representative that the patient was evaluated to assess the frequency of vns stimulations and discomfort.The patient had complained of receiving too many autostimulations a day and that the device goes off frequently and, due to this, she experiences a bit of discomfort.The physician ordered an ekg to check for any abnormalities in the patient's heart rhythm and no anomalies were found.The patient then requested that the autostimulation threshold be lowered so that she receives more autostimulations despite the complaint that it was stimulating too frequently as she was paranoid that she would not feel stimulation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Describe event or problem, corrected data: initial report and follow-up report #1 inadvertently reported information regarding the temporary magnet disablement described as a "reset" which was unrelated to the reportable event of the seroma.Describe event or problem, corrected data: follow-up report #2 inadvertently reported information regarding frequency of autostimulations which was unrelated to the reportable event of the seroma.
 
Event Description
It was reported by the patient that she was scheduling a consult with the surgeon regarding surgery regarding adverse events related to vns stimulation.Follow up for the vns stimulation related events which were unrelated to the pocket of fluid reported in this mfr.Report revealed that the surgery would be for the patient's comfort.As it was previously reported that the patient was to be evaluated for comfort per the pocket of fluid, no additional reports will be reported for the pocket of fluid in which the generator was allegedly floating unless further relevant information is received after the completion of the surgery.
 
Event Description
Follow up with the physician's office and patient revealed that the patient was satisfied with her seizure control and the seizure activity was reported as below the pre-vns baseline.The reported "reset" was to place the magnet on top of the device and then remove the magnet.The er stated that the patient felt the stimulation due to the breakthrough seizure and was, therefore, more sensitive.The patient was referred to neurosurgery for evaluation of the reported pocket of fluid and discomfort.The patient reported that the generator site was sensitive and warm.There was no visual signs of infection, which was ruled out.Diagnostics were reported as within normal limits.It was stated that the patient was to be evaluated for comfort with no replacement planned.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PULSE GEN MODEL 1000
Type of Device
GENERATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS - HOUSTON
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer (Section G)
CYBERONICS - HOUSTON
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
rachel kohn
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key9364435
MDR Text Key167651524
Report Number1644487-2019-02279
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
UDI-Device Identifier05425025750405
UDI-Public05425025750405
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,consum
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 02/18/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date03/21/2021
Device Model Number1000
Device Lot Number6190
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Event Location Other
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/04/2019
Initial Date FDA Received11/22/2019
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received11/27/2019
01/06/2020
01/24/2020
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/19/2019
01/24/2020
02/18/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured03/28/2019
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age35 YR
-
-