Investigation results: the device was received for visual and functional testing.Visual testing revealed score marks on the rod due to incremental distractions.Functional testing revealed the rod was unable to distract with manual distractor and the electronic remote controller (erc).The rod was sectioned and debris build up was found, which may have caused the reduced functionality.Sectioning of the rod determined that it could not be separated from the housing without use of high force.Bending forces applied to the rod from patient anatomy/activity may have caused the distraction rod to wedge into the housing tube, which would cause the rod to be jam.
|