• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTERSTIM II; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTERSTIM II; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE Back to Search Results
Model Number 3058
Device Problems Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395); Inappropriate/Inadequate Shock/Stimulation (1574)
Patient Problems Paralysis (1997); Weakness (2145); Distress (2329); Electric Shock (2554)
Event Date 08/03/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Other applicable components are: product type: lead.Product id: 3889-33, lot#: va1ggyh , implanted: (b)(6) 2017, explanted: (b)(6) 2017, product type: lead.Other relevant device(s) are: product id: 3889-33, serial/lot #: (b)(4), ubd: 26-apr-2021, udi#: (b)(4).If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
The patient re-reported that they got thrown off a trailer and the implant broke.They stated they had the ins replaced on (b)(6) 2017 due to this and stated they didn't think their healthcare provider replaced the leads at that time.They stated they thought this because it wasn't any different after.They clarified that the implant moved over into their spine and was paralyzing their legs and they needed therapy.They stated that if they would have taken the old one out the first time their legs would have straightened out.They confirmed this was a continuation of a previously reported event and that this first started on (b)(6) 2017.They re-reported that a couple of weeks later the stimulator where they had fallen broke and it shocked them like a taser going between their legs.They stated they went to the hospital due to this and stated they called pennsylvania to shut it off because they didn't know how to.They stated that then their healthcare provider came back from vacation and they decided to try again.The patient stated that if their healthcare provider would have taken the old wiring their legs wouldn't have been paralyzed because it moved into their spine.They stated when they went back and told their healthcare provider to turn off the stimulation and the patient stated they could feel a difference when the stimulation was shut off.They stated their neurologist told them to have the entire system removed due to the events previously reported and noted above.They stated they had the ins and leads removed about 3 weeks prior and stated that since then they could stand up and walk and their legs were working, but their body was very weak and stressed because this had been a 3 year thing.They confirmed they did not have any leads or ins implanted at the time of the report.It was noted that the patient was difficult to follow throughout explaining the timeline of events.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INTERSTIM II
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
lisa woodward clark
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263920
MDR Report Key9375994
MDR Text Key168820409
Report Number3004209178-2019-22618
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code EZW
UDI-Device Identifier00613994913654
UDI-Public00613994913654
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970004
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 11/26/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/14/2019
Device Model Number3058
Device Catalogue Number3058
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/04/2019
Initial Date FDA Received11/26/2019
Date Device Manufactured10/22/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other; Required Intervention;
Patient Age73 YR
-
-