• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PFIZER CONSUMER HEALTH CARE THERMACARE LOWER BACK & HIP; DISPOSABLE PACK, HOT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PFIZER CONSUMER HEALTH CARE THERMACARE LOWER BACK & HIP; DISPOSABLE PACK, HOT Back to Search Results
Device Problem Product Quality Problem (1506)
Patient Problem Burn, Thermal (2530)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The root cause category is non-assignable (complaint not confirmed as a quality defect).There was limited device specific information provided, no batch number or return sample was available for evaluation.Without a batch reference number and/or return sample a manufacturing and technical evaluation cannot be completed for the wrap involved in this case.There is not a product quality related trend identified for the subclass adverse event safety/serious/unknown.The manufacturing operations employ quality control procedures which include in process testing, thermal testing and visual inspection, to ensure the quality of the product being packaged.
 
Event Description
Burn on back [thermal burn].Case narrative: this is a spontaneous report from a contactable consumer.A female patient of an unspecified age started to use thermacare heatwrap (thermacare lower back & hip) from an unspecified date for an unspecified indication.The patient's medical history and concomitant medications were not reported.On an unspecified date, the patient reported "i bought the thermacare for the back and now i experienced a burn on my back.I can give you a photo to show the burn.I have severe pain." action taken with the suspect product was unknown.Clinical outcome of the event was unknown.According to product quality complaint (pqc) group: severity of harm: s3.Dchu conclusion: a summary investigation is being performed as providing the batch record information is the manufacturing site's requirement.Based on the complaint narrative, the patient sustained a burn injury with product use.Review of complaint description concludes there is no device malfunction.Conclusion: the root cause category is non-assignable (complaint not confirmed as a quality defect).There was limited device specific information provided, no batch number or return sample was available for evaluation.Without a batch reference number and/or return sample a manufacturing and technical evaluation cannot be completed for the wrap involved in this case.There is not a product quality related trend identified for the subclass adverse event safety/serious/unknown.The manufacturing operations employ quality control procedures which include in process testing, thermal testing and visual inspection, to ensure the quality of the product being packaged.Follow-up (25nov2019 and 26nov2019): new information from product quality complaint group included: severity of harm, investigation results, and case upgraded to a serious malfunction reportable mdr.Company clinical evaluation comment: based on the information provided, the event of "burn on my back" as described is considered serious bodily injury potentially requiring medical intervention to prevent permanent damage or impairment of body structure.A causal relationship between the device and the event cannot be ruled out.There was limited device specific information provided, no batch number or return sample was available for evaluation.Without a batch reference number and/or return sample a manufacturing and technical evaluation cannot be completed for the wrap involved in this case.Product effect varies with each individual.No further investigations or actions is suggested at this time.Comment: based on the information provided, the event of "burn on my back" as described is considered serious bodily injury potentially requiring medical intervention to prevent permanent damage or impairment of body structure.A causal relationship between the device and the event cannot be ruled out.There was limited device specific information provided, no batch number or return sample was available for evaluation.Without a batch reference number and/or return sample a manufacturing and technical evaluation cannot be completed for the wrap involved in this case.Product effect varies with each individual.No further investigations or actions is suggested at this time.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
THERMACARE LOWER BACK & HIP
Type of Device
DISPOSABLE PACK, HOT
Manufacturer (Section D)
PFIZER CONSUMER HEALTH CARE
1231 wyandotte drive
albany GA 31705
Manufacturer Contact
stella pietrafesa
235 e42nd street
new york, NY 10017
MDR Report Key9417665
MDR Text Key187210393
Report Number1066015-2019-00518
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code IMD
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K953442
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer,foreign
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 11/15/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received12/05/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-