The root cause category is non-assignable (complaint not confirmed as a quality defect).There was limited device specific information provided, no batch number or return sample was available for evaluation.Without a batch reference number and/or return sample a manufacturing and technical evaluation cannot be completed for the wrap involved in this case.There is not a product quality related trend identified for the subclass adverse event safety/serious/unknown.The manufacturing operations employ quality control procedures which include in process testing, thermal testing and visual inspection, to ensure the quality of the product being packaged.
|
Burn on back [thermal burn].Case narrative: this is a spontaneous report from a contactable consumer.A female patient of an unspecified age started to use thermacare heatwrap (thermacare lower back & hip) from an unspecified date for an unspecified indication.The patient's medical history and concomitant medications were not reported.On an unspecified date, the patient reported "i bought the thermacare for the back and now i experienced a burn on my back.I can give you a photo to show the burn.I have severe pain." action taken with the suspect product was unknown.Clinical outcome of the event was unknown.According to product quality complaint (pqc) group: severity of harm: s3.Dchu conclusion: a summary investigation is being performed as providing the batch record information is the manufacturing site's requirement.Based on the complaint narrative, the patient sustained a burn injury with product use.Review of complaint description concludes there is no device malfunction.Conclusion: the root cause category is non-assignable (complaint not confirmed as a quality defect).There was limited device specific information provided, no batch number or return sample was available for evaluation.Without a batch reference number and/or return sample a manufacturing and technical evaluation cannot be completed for the wrap involved in this case.There is not a product quality related trend identified for the subclass adverse event safety/serious/unknown.The manufacturing operations employ quality control procedures which include in process testing, thermal testing and visual inspection, to ensure the quality of the product being packaged.Follow-up (25nov2019 and 26nov2019): new information from product quality complaint group included: severity of harm, investigation results, and case upgraded to a serious malfunction reportable mdr.Company clinical evaluation comment: based on the information provided, the event of "burn on my back" as described is considered serious bodily injury potentially requiring medical intervention to prevent permanent damage or impairment of body structure.A causal relationship between the device and the event cannot be ruled out.There was limited device specific information provided, no batch number or return sample was available for evaluation.Without a batch reference number and/or return sample a manufacturing and technical evaluation cannot be completed for the wrap involved in this case.Product effect varies with each individual.No further investigations or actions is suggested at this time.Comment: based on the information provided, the event of "burn on my back" as described is considered serious bodily injury potentially requiring medical intervention to prevent permanent damage or impairment of body structure.A causal relationship between the device and the event cannot be ruled out.There was limited device specific information provided, no batch number or return sample was available for evaluation.Without a batch reference number and/or return sample a manufacturing and technical evaluation cannot be completed for the wrap involved in this case.Product effect varies with each individual.No further investigations or actions is suggested at this time.
|