(b)(4).Batch # r9325n.Investigation summary: the device was returned with the upper jaw detached and not returned.In addition, the i-blade was broken off and not returned the device was connected to the generator and it was recognized.Because the jaw was detached, not all functional testing could be performed with the generator.No alert screens were displayed during testing.A probable cause of the damage to the jaw could be not allowing thick and fibrous tissues to denature prior to i-blade advancement.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot/batch number, and no non-conformances were identified.
|
It was reported that during an unknown procedure, the enseal g2 didn´t work properly, the gen 11 showed this message, "replace the instrument." there was no delay to the procedure, the procedure was successfully completed, and there was not patient consequence.
|