• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PFIZER CONSUMER HEALTH CARE THERMACARE HEATWRAP; DISPOSABLE PACK, HOT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PFIZER CONSUMER HEALTH CARE THERMACARE HEATWRAP; DISPOSABLE PACK, HOT Back to Search Results
Device Problem Defective Device (2588)
Patient Problems Pain (1994); Burn, Thermal (2530)
Event Date 03/25/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Summary of investigation: this investigation was conducted for an unknown lot number lower back/hip (lbh) product.There was limited device specific information provided, no batch number or return sample was available for evaluation.Without a batch reference number and /or return sample a manufacturing and technical evaluation cannot be completed for the wrap involved in this case.There is not a product quality related trend identified for the subclass adverse event safety request for investigation.Conclusion:the root cause category is non-assignable (complaint not confirmed as a quality defect).There was limited device specific information provided, no batch number or return sample was available for evaluation.Without a batch reference number and/or return sample a manufacturing and technical evaluation cannot be completed for the wrap involved in this case.There is not a product quality related trend identified for the subclass adverse event safety request for investigation.The manufacturing operations employ quality control procedures which include in process testing, thermal testing and visual inspection, to ensure the quality of the product being packaged.Lot trend assmt.& rationale: a lot trend was not performed as the lot number is unknown.
 
Event Description
I would say half hour 45 minutes everything started to burn right off [thermal burn], did not do anything for pain but it sure burn [device ineffective].Case narrative: this is a spontaneous report from a contactable consumer (patient).A patient of unspecified age and gender started to receive thermacare heatwrap (thermacare heatwrap), from an unspecified date at unknown frequency for pain.The patient medical history and concomitant medications were not reported.The patient stated, "i bought thermacare yesterday ((b)(6) 2019) at (pharmacy name) and i put it on last night on my knees and my arm and my shoulder and i would say half hour - 45 minutes everything started to burn right off it was terrible and i finally got up and i washed everything off, but it still it burnt for about an hour afterwards and then it settled down but it did not do anything for pain but it sure burn." the action taken for thermacare heatwrap was unknown.The outcome of event burn was recovered on an unspecified date in (b)(6) 2019.The outcome of the other event was unknown.According to the product quality complaint group: summary of investigation: this investigation was conducted for an unknown lot number lower back/hip (lbh) product.There was limited device specific information provided, no batch number or return sample was available for evaluation.Without a batch reference number and /or return sample a manufacturing and technical evaluation cannot be completed for the wrap involved in this case.There is not a product quality related trend identified for the subclass adverse event safety request for investigation.Site conclusion: the root cause category is non-assignable (complaint not confirmed as a quality defect).There was limited device specific information provided, no batch number or return sample was available for evaluation.Without a batch reference number and/or return sample a manufacturing and technical evaluation cannot be completed for the wrap involved in this case.There is not a product quality related trend identified for the subclass adverse event safety request for investigation.The manufacturing operations employ quality control procedures which include in process testing, thermal testing and visual inspection, to ensure the quality of the product being packaged.Lot trend assmt.& rationale: a lot trend was not performed as the lot number is unknown.Dchu conclusion: based on the complaint narrative, the patient sustained a burn injury after product use.Review of complaint description concludes there is no device malfunction.Severity of harm: s3.Follow-up (14aug2019): new information received from the product quality complaint group includes investigational results.Follow-up attempts are completed.No further information is expected.Follow-up (19aug2019 and 17oct2019): new information received from the product quality complaint group includes severity rating and dchu conclusion.Company clinical evaluation comment: based on the information provided, the event thermal burn as described is considered serious bodily injury potentially requiring medical intervention to prevent permanent damage or impairment of body structure.The event device ineffective is non-serious.The events are medically assessed as associated with the use of the device.There was limited device specific information provided, no batch number or return sample was available for evaluation.Without a batch reference number and/or return sample a manufacturing and technical evaluation cannot be completed for the wrap involved in this case.Product effect varies with each individual.No device malfunction has been identified.No remedial action/corrective action/field safety corrective action is suggested at this time., comment: based on the information provided, the event thermal burn as described is considered serious bodily injury potentially requiring medical intervention to prevent permanent damage or impairment of body structure.The event device ineffective is non-serious.The events are medically assessed as associated with the use of the device.There was limited device specific information provided, no batch number or return sample was available for evaluation.Without a batch reference number and/or return sample a manufacturing and technical evaluation cannot be completed for the wrap involved in this case.Product effect varies with each individual.No device malfunction has been identified.No remedial action/corrective action/field safety corrective action is suggested at this time.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
THERMACARE HEATWRAP
Type of Device
DISPOSABLE PACK, HOT
Manufacturer (Section D)
PFIZER CONSUMER HEALTH CARE
1231 wyandotte drive
albany GA 31705
Manufacturer Contact
stella pietrafesa
235 e42nd street
new york, NY 10017
MDR Report Key9444781
MDR Text Key188495892
Report Number1066015-2019-00526
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code IMD
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K953442
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 03/26/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received12/10/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-