It was reported a female patient required placement of an ultrathane dawson-mueller mac-loc locking loop multipurpose drainage catheter for an left axilla abscess drainage procedure.After placement, the operator noticed "the drain could not maintain a seal and so suction was not possible".The dressing was reinforced and the device was kept "insitu for a few hours".Suction was not achieved, so the drain was replaced with a new similar device.No other adverse effects were reported for this incident.
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unchanged, unknown or unavailable.Investigation ¿ evaluation.A review of the complaint history, device history record, drawing, instructions for use (ifu), manufacturing instructions, quality control, and specifications of the device were conducted during the investigation.The complaint device was not returned so a physical examination could not be performed.Since relevant dimensions could not be measured against specification, the device cannot be confirmed to be manufactured out of specification.Additionally, a document based investigation evaluation was performed.The proper procedures are in place to identify and prevent this failure mode prior to device distribution.The risk specifications covering mac-loc drainage catheters include both hub separation and leakage as a potential failure mode.The identified risk controls include manufacturing quality control checks and process validation.The technical files covering mac-loc drainage catheters indicate that the risks associated with these devices are acceptable when weighed against the benefits.The ifu supplied with the mac-loc drainage catheters instruct that the product should be inspected prior to use to ensure no damage has occurred.A review of the device history record (dhr) was also conducted as a part of the investigation.The dhr for the complaint lot and related subassembly lots revealed no reported nonconformances.A database search revealed no other complaints from the complaint lot at the time of investigation.Since there are no related nonconformances or other complaints from this lot, there is no evidence that nonconforming product exists in house or in the field.Based on the information provided, inspection of the returned product and the results of the investigation, it was concluded that a manufacturing and quality control deficiency possibly contributed to this incident.Corrective actions including implementation of a gap gauge and retraining were performed.The appropriate personnel have been notified.Per the quality engineering risk assessment no further action is required.Cook will continue to monitor for similar complaints.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|