• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: THE SPECTRANETICS CORPORATION SPECTRANETICS LEAD LOCKING DEVICE; LLD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

THE SPECTRANETICS CORPORATION SPECTRANETICS LEAD LOCKING DEVICE; LLD Back to Search Results
Model Number 518-062
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Iatrogenic Source (2498); Cardiac Perforation (2513)
Event Date 11/26/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Device lot number and expiration date unavailable.Device manufacture date unavailable because lot number is unavailable.
 
Event Description
A lead extraction procedure commenced to remove a right ventricular (rv) lead; the lead was no longer needed, and a biventricular pacemaker with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (biv icd) upgrade was planned.A right atrial (ra) lead was present as well within the patient, but this lead was not targeted for extraction.Spectranetics glidelight laser sheath and lead locking device (lld) were being used in the procedure.During the procedure, it was noted that there was ''tough'' lead on lead binding at the entrance to the superior vena cava (svc).At that time, the physician chose to upsize to a larger glidelight device and was able to progress to approximately one inch proximal of the tip of the rv lead.The lead released at that time, and patient's vital signs were stable.The glidelight, along with the lead, were removed from the patient's body.Approximately 30 seconds later, the patient's blood pressure steadily dropped, and the left heart border was observed as not moving.Transesophageal echocardiography (tee) revealed a very small effusion in the right ventricle (rv).Rescue efforts commenced, including rescue device, subxyphoid window, and pericardiocentesis.The physician was performing the pericardiocentesis and was having difficulty due to a clot.At that time, the surgeon performed a full sternotomy.The surgeon noted that the rv was ''stuck to almost sealed to the diaphragm''.When he unstuck them, he removed a large clot by hand, and the rv effusion became a much larger hole.The surgeon was able to stop the bleeding and safely place the patient on bypass.Two hours after the initial injury was identified, the repair in the rv was successful, the upgrade of the originally planned biv icd was completed, and the patient survived the procedure.It was noted that the patient's ventricle was ''not normal'' and confirmed with the physician that this was not caused by laser sheath misuse; the thought was that the lead was outside the wall of the heart, and it is not believed that the glidelight caused the tear.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SPECTRANETICS LEAD LOCKING DEVICE
Type of Device
LLD
Manufacturer (Section D)
THE SPECTRANETICS CORPORATION
9965 federal drive
colorado springs CO 80921
Manufacturer Contact
barbara creel
9965 federal drive
colorado springs, CO 80921
719447-246
MDR Report Key9466370
MDR Text Key177006440
Report Number1721279-2019-00217
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DRB
UDI-Device Identifier00813132023072
UDI-Public00813132023072
Combination Product (y/n)Y
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K142116
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/01/2005,11/26/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number518-062
Device Catalogue Number518-062
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/26/2019
Initial Date FDA Received12/13/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Life Threatening; Required Intervention;
Patient Age71 YR
Patient Weight80
-
-