|
Model Number ZA9003 |
Device Problems
Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923); Unintended Movement (3026)
|
Patient Problem
No Code Available (3191)
|
Event Date 03/26/2019 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(6).(b)(4).All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that a monofocal intraocular lens (iol), model za9003 was implanted on (b)(6) 2008.Then on (b)(6) 2019, the dislocated iol was picked up and fixed to the sclera.It was indicated that at the examination on (b)(6) 2019, the optical part of the iol had greatly inclined and the iol was fixed in the sac, but the zinn (zonule of zinn) was torn and the only 7 o'clock direction zinn had no tear and lens was hanging at this site.For this reason, an iol was explanted and a new lens was implanted on (b)(6) 2019 which that iol was fixed to the sclera.When explanted, the haptic was fixed in the sclera on both sides, but the root of the haptic would not fixed to the optic and the optic was rotating vertically, that the lens went up or down and rotating further in the eye.It is unknown if the replacement lens was lens johnson and johnson lens.It was noted that the status of the new lens which was reported to have been fixed sclera is unknown.There was no patient injury reported.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device available for evaluation, returned to manufacturer on: 12/06/2019.Device evaluation: the product was received at the manufacturing site in a petri dish.The lens is cut, most probably related to the explant.The lens has both haptics attached.One of the haptics is crimped, this could be related to the handling of the lens during the surgical procedures (implant and/or explant of the lens).The haptics tips are rough.The process engineer was consulted for testing of the returned lens.Process engineer indicated that a testing to a lens that has been prepared and eventually explanted at the surgical site may lead to ambiguous results.There is no indication that the damage on the lens, haptics included, that could be associated to the lens manufacturing process.Manufacturing records review: manufacturing record review cannot be performed since the serial number is unknown.A search of complaints related to serial number cannot be performed since the serial number is unknown.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation, there is no indication of a product quality deficiency.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This correction mdr is being submitted to address inaccurate information in section f on the xml version of the previous submission caused by a software glitch in the transmission process.The internal non-conformance numbers for this software issue are (b)(4) and capa(b)(4).
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|