|
Model Number 3243 |
Device Problems
Entrapment of Device (1212); Difficult to Advance (2920)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 12/09/2019 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(6).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the burr would not advance over the guidewire.A 1.5mm rotapro was selected for an atherectomy procedure.During withdrawal, in dynaglide mode, the burr was no longer advancing over the wire.The rotapro and wire were removed together from the patient.The procedure was completed and there were no patient complications.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the burr would not advance over the guidewire.A 1.5mm rotapro was selected for an atherectomy procedure.During withdrawal, in dynaglide mode, the burr was no longer advancing over the wire.The rotapro and wire were removed together from the patient.The procedure was completed and there were no patient complications.It was further reported that the issue occurred when the device was rotating in dynaglide mode in order to advance the burr to the lesion.It occurred after the wire had passed through the device.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
E1: initial reporter state: (b)(6).Updated device analysis by mfr: the returned product consisted of a rotapro device.The advancer unit and burr catheter were received together.The rotawire used during the procedure was not returned for investigation.The advancer, coil, sheath, handshake connections, burr, and annulus were microscopically examined.Microscopic examination of the device revealed that the annulus was damaged and not rounded which is consistent with damage seen with the use of a rotawire.The coil was stretched.As the rotawire that was used during the procedure was not returned; functional testing was performed using a test.009 rotawire.The test rotawire was inserted through the burr and advanced through the entire length of the device with no resistance.Functional testing was performed by attempting to rotate the drive shaft, however, it was unable to rotate.Product analysis confirmed the reported event due to the melted ultem.As the device was unable to run, the brake function was unable to be tested.Visual inspection of the brake showed no irregularities or damage.Inspection of the remainder of the device presented no other damage or irregularities.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
E1: initial reporter state: (b)(6).Device returned and evaluated by manufacturer.The returned product consisted of a rotapro device.The advancer unit and burr catheter were received together.The rotawire used during the procedure was not returned for investigation.The advancer, coil, sheath, handshake connections, burr, and annulus were microscopically examined.Microscopic examination of the device revealed that the annulus was damaged and not rounded which is consistent with damage seen with the use of a rotawire.The coil was stretched.As the rotawire that was used during the procedure was not returned; functional testing was performed using a test.009 rotawire.The test rotawire was inserted through the burr and advanced through the entire length of the device with no resistance.Inspection of the remainder of the device presented no other damage or irregularities.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the burr would not advance over the guidewire.A 1.5mm rotapro was selected for an atherectomy procedure.During withdrawal, in dynaglide mode, the burr was no longer advancing over the wire.The rotapro and wire were removed together from the patient.The procedure was completed and there were no patient complications.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|