• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK IRELAND LTD UNKNOWN; ESW PROSTHESIS, ESOPHAGEAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK IRELAND LTD UNKNOWN; ESW PROSTHESIS, ESOPHAGEAL Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNKNOWN
Device Problems Use of Device Problem (1670); Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017)
Patient Problems Pain (1994); No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 12/23/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Pma/510(k) #: k162717 and k093619.As the exact rpn is unknown 510k#'s for both fully and partially covered evolution devices have been provided.Investigation is still pending, a follow up mdr will be submitted to include the investigation conclusions.
 
Event Description
Complaint received from internal personnel via e-mail on 03dec2019--did 04dec2019.As reported to customer relations: "in one patient with a benign proximal stricture, the diameter of the deployed stent was too small to completely cover the fistulous open, therefore ultimately requiring the stent to be exchanged for a stent with a larger diameter.This file has been opened to capture the user error associated with the incorrect size stent used and the subsequent intervention performed as a result." fda mdr reporting required: this event meets the criteria of an fda ¿serious injury¿ report as per fda guidelines ¿medical device reporting for manufacturers (2016)¿ section 2.13 and 2.15 as the patient required the stent to be exchanged for a stent with a larger diameter.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Pma/510(k)#: k162717.Device evaluation: the evo device of unknown lot number was not returned to cook ireland for evaluation.With the information provided, document based investigation was conducted.This file was created from the attached journal article.A total of twenty five patients were identified in this retrospective study of 35 procedures over an 8-year period.The stents used were as follows: 11endomaxx (merit), 11 wallflex (boston scientific), 5 polyflex (boston scientific), and 3 evolution cook endoscopy) were used.This file captures user error- stent diameter too small.Documents review including ifu review: as the evo stent is unknown device from unknown lot number, a review of the relevant manufacturing records cannot be conducted.Prior to distribution all evo (partially and fully covered esophageal stent) devices are subject to visual inspection and functional checks to ensure device integrity.These inspections and functional checks are outlined in internal procedures in place at cirl.As per the instructions for use, ifu0061-5, which informs the user about the precautions: "a complete diagnostic must be performed prior to use to determine proper stent size".On review of the information provided, there is evidence to suggest that the user did not follow the instructions for use.Root cause review: a definitive root cause could be determined from the available information.A definitive root cause could be attributed to user error, as per details given in the article "the diameter of the deployed stent was too small to completely cover the fistulous open, therefore ultimately requiring the stent to be exchanged for a stent with a lager diameter".Summary: customer complaint is confirmed based on customer testimony.The patient outcome is unknown.Complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for potential emerging trends.
 
Event Description
Complaint received from internal personnel via e-mail on 03dec2019--did 04dec2019.As reported to customer relations: "in one patient with a benign proximal stricture, the diameter of the deployed stent was too small to completely cover the fistulous open, therefore ultimately requiring the stent to be exchanged for a stent with a larger diameter.This file has been opened to capture the user error associated with the incorrect size stent used and the subsequent intervention performed as a result." fda mdr reporting required: this event meets the criteria of an fda ¿serious injury¿ report as per fda guidelines ¿medical device reporting for manufacturers (2016)¿ section 2.13 and 2.15 as the patient required the stent to be exchanged for a stent with a larger diameter.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNKNOWN
Type of Device
ESW PROSTHESIS, ESOPHAGEAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK IRELAND LTD
o halloran road
limerick
MDR Report Key9494261
MDR Text Key188933095
Report Number3001845648-2019-00755
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code ESW
Combination Product (y/n)N
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/24/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNKNOWN
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Distributor Facility Aware Date12/23/2016
Event Location Hospital
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/11/2019
Initial Date FDA Received12/19/2019
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received12/11/2019
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/02/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-