The account alleges that during a recent spinal surgery procedure, the anesthetist claimed that they were trying to maintain the patient's blood pressures to ensure spinal cord perfusion when they noticed a fairly significant increase in arterial pressures, over the course of a few minutes, which was initially corroborated with non-invasive blood pressures measurements.The systolic pressure allegedly rose from 140mmhg to over 200mmhg.They attempted to treat the patient's hypertension unsuccessfully with magnesium sulphate.Eventually, the arterial line transducer, was re-zeroed again, only to find that the actual systolic blood pressure was closer to 65mmhg.This reading required urgent and aggressive intervention with successful vasopressor administration.No patient injury to report.
|
The suspect device was returned for evaluation.The device was examined visually, and functional testing was performed.The issue noted by the user could not be reproduced.The complaint could not be confirmed an the root cause could not be determined.A review of the device history record was performed, and no exception documents were found.A review of the complaint database was performed and no similar complaints for this lot number were found.
|