(b)(4).A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device batch pdb4841 and no non-conformances were identified.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at the later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: please clarify the actual damage with the two packages for example in one of the photos it looks like the peak pack is bent but it is difficult to see if the seal was impacted (opened) resulting in the two devices sterility being compromised? it is not certain that the package is completely damaged, but the product has obvious creases and the opening is obviously torn.How were the product stored? store at room temperature.Were the devices loose or something stored on the devices? no, they were not.What is the status of the devices being returned? we are waiting for the return of the sample.If the devices were shipped for evaluation, provide the tracking number? it will be noted when the sample is shipped and a tracking number is generated.Confirm event occurred intraoperative? it is not used in surgery.Procedure device were going to be used in, if event occurred intraoperative? it is not used in surgery.
|
It was reported that the patient underwent an unknown procedure on (b)(6) 2019 and the absorbable adhesive barrier was used.During the surgery, before used on the patient, it was noted the packing was damaged.Another device was used to complete the surgery.There were no adverse consequences reported.
|